Top 87 Quotes & Sayings by Arthur Eddington

Explore popular quotes and sayings by a British scientist Arthur Eddington.
Last updated on September 18, 2024.
Arthur Eddington

Sir Arthur Stanley Eddington was an English astronomer, physicist, and mathematician. He was also a philosopher of science and a populariser of science. The Eddington limit, the natural limit to the luminosity of stars, or the radiation generated by accretion onto a compact object, is named in his honour.

Who will observe the observers?
The mathematics is not there till we put it there.
It is even possible that laws which have not their origin in the mind may be irrational, and we can never succeed in formulating them. — © Arthur Eddington
It is even possible that laws which have not their origin in the mind may be irrational, and we can never succeed in formulating them.
We have found a strange footprint on the shores of the unknown.
Every body continues in its state of rest or uniform motion in a straight line, except insofar as it doesn't.
It is also a good rule not to put overmuch confidence in the observational results that are put forward until they are confirmed by theory.
It is one thing for the human mind to extract from the phenomena of nature the laws which it has itself put into them; it may be a far harder thing to extract laws over which it has no control.
It is impossible to trap modern physics into predicting anything with perfect determinism because it deals with probabilities from the outset.
Shuffling is the only thing which Nature cannot undo.
If an army of monkeys were strumming on typewriters, they might write all the books in the British Museum.
We have found that where science has progressed the farthest, the mind has but regained from nature that which the mind put into nature.
It is sound judgment to hope that in the not too distant future we shall be competent to understand so simple a thing as a star.
The quest of the absolute leads into the four-dimensional world.
If your theory is found to be against the second law of theromodynamics, I give you no hope; there is nothing for it but to collapse in deepest humiliation.
Something unknown is doing we don't know what.
Oh leave the Wise our measures to collate. One thing at least is certain, light has weight. One thing is certain and the rest debate. Light rays, when near the Sun, do not go straight.
Probably the simplest hypothesis... is that there may be a slow process of annihilation of matter. — © Arthur Eddington
Probably the simplest hypothesis... is that there may be a slow process of annihilation of matter.
We used to think that if we knew one, we knew two, because one and one are two. We are finding that we must learn a great deal more about 'and'.
Proof is an idol before whom the pure mathematician tortures himself.
We often think that when we have completed our study of one we know all about two, because 'two' is 'one and one.' We forget that we still have to make a study of 'and.'
Unless the structure of the nucleus has a surprise in store for us, the conclusion seems plain — there is nothing in the whole system of laws of physics that cannot be deduced unambiguously from epistemological considerations.
The helium which we handle must have been put together at some time and some place. We do not argue with the critic who urges that the stars are not hot enough for this process; we tell him to go and find a hotter place.
We have found that where science has progressed the farthest, the mind has but regained from nature that which the mind has put into nature. We have found a strange foot-print on the shores of the unknown. We have devised profound theories, one after another, to account for its origin. At last, we have succeeded in reconstructing the creature that made the foot-print. And Lo! it is our own.
Time is the supreme Law of nature.
Our ultimate analysis of space leads us not to a "here" and a "there," but to an extension such as that which relates "here" and "there." To put the conclusion rather crudely-space is not a lot of points close together; it is a lot of distances interlocked.
The physical world is entirely abstract and without actuality apart from its linkage to consciousness.
Schrödinger's wave-mechanics is not a physical theory, but a dodge - and a very good dodge too.
I ask you to look both ways. For the road to a knowledge of the stars leads through the atom; and important knowledge of the atom has been reached through the stars.
If your theory is found to be against the second law of thermodynamics I give you no hope; there is nothing for it but to collapse in deepest humiliation.
In Einstein's theory of relativity the observer is a man who sets out in quest of truth armed with a measuring-rod. In quantum theory he sets out with a sieve.
Asked in 1919 whether it was true that only three people in the world understood the theory of general relativity, [Eddington] allegedly replied: "Who's the third?"
We are bits of stellar matter that got cold by accident, bits of a star gone wrong.
What we makes of the world must be largely dependent on the sense-organs that we happen to possess. How the world must have changed since the man came to rely on his eyes rather than his nose.
An ocean traveler has even more vividly the impression that the ocean is made of waves than that it is made of water.
Life would be stunted and narrow if we could feel no significance in the world around us beyond that which can be weighed and measured with the tools of the physicist or described by the metrical symbols of the mathematician.
The pursuit of truth in science transcends national boundaries. It takes us beyond hatred and anger and fear. It is the best of us.
Events do not happen; they are just there, and we come across them.
Whether in the intellectual pursuits of science or in the mystical pursuits of the spirit, the light beckons ahead, and the purpose surging in our nature responds.
If someone points out to you that your pet theory of the universe is in disagreement with Maxwell's equations - then so much the worse for Maxwell's equations. If it is found to be contradicted by observation - well, these experimentalists do bungle things sometimes. But if your theory is found to be against the second law of thermodynamics I can give you no hope; there is nothing for it but to collapse in deepest humiliation.
There was a time when we wanted to be told what an electron is. The question was never answered. No familiar conceptions can be woven around the electron; it belongs to the waiting list.
It cannot be denied that for a society which has to create scarcity to save its members from starvation, to whom abundance spells disaster, and to whom unlimited energy means unlimited power for war and destruction, there is an ominous cloud in the distance though at present it be no bigger than a man's hand.
Philosophically, the notion of a beginning of the present order of Nature is repugnant to me ... I should like to find a genuine loophole. — © Arthur Eddington
Philosophically, the notion of a beginning of the present order of Nature is repugnant to me ... I should like to find a genuine loophole.
It is reasonable to hope that in the not too distant future we shall be competent to understand so simple a thing as a star.
I believe there are 15, 747, 724, 136, 275, 002, 577, 605, 653, 961, 181, 555, 468, 044, 717, 914, 527, 116, 709, 366, 231, 425, 076, 185, 631, 031, 296 protons in the universe and the same number of electrons.
There is only one law of Nature-the second law of thermodynamics-which recognises a distinction between past and future more profound than the difference of plus and minus. It stands aloof from all the rest. ... It opens up a new province of knowledge, namely, the study of organisation; and it is in connection with organisation that a direction of time-flow and a distinction between doing and undoing appears for the first time.
It is a primitive form of thought that things exist or do not exist.
In the world of physics we watch a shadowgraph performance of the drama of familiar life. The shadow of my elbow rests on the shadow table as the shadow ink flows over the shadow paper. It is all symbolic, and as a symbol the physicist leaves it. ... The frank realisation that physical science is concerned with a world of shadows is one of the most significant of recent advances.
The electron, as it leaves the atom, crystallises out of Schrodinger's mist like a genie emerging from his bottle.
A star is drawing on some vast reservoir of energy by means unknown to us. This reservoir can scarcely be other than the subatomic energy which, it is known exists abundantly in all matter; we sometimes dream that man will one day learn how to release it and use it for his service. The store is well nigh inexhaustible, if only it could be tapped. There is sufficient in the Sun to maintain its output of heat for 15 billion years.
You cannot disturb the tiniest petal of a flower without the troubling of a distant star.
Something unknown is doing we don't know what-that is what our theory amounts to.
Whatever else there may be in our nature, responsibility toward truth is one of its attributes. — © Arthur Eddington
Whatever else there may be in our nature, responsibility toward truth is one of its attributes.
In any attempt to bridge the domains of experience belonging to the spiritual and physical sides of nature, time occupies the key position.
Do not put too much confidence in experimental results until they have been confirmed by theory.
To the pure geometer the radius of curvature is an incidental characteristic - like the grin of the Cheshire cat. To the physicist it is an indispensable characteristic. It would be going too far to say that to the physicist the cat is merely incidental to the grin. Physics is concerned with interrelatedness such as the interrelatedness of cats and grins. In this case the "cat without a grin" and the "grin without a cat" are equally set aside as purely mathematical phantasies.
There once was a brainy baboon, Who always breathed down a bassoon, For he said, It appears That in billions of years I shall certainly hit on a tune.
It is one thing for the human mind to extract from the phenomena of nature the laws which it has itself put into them; it may be a far harder thing to extract laws over which it has no control. It is even possible that laws which have not their origin in the mind may be irrational, and we can never succeed in formulating them.
The idea of a universal mind or Logos would be, I think, a fairly plausible inference from the present state of scientific theory.
Science is one thing, wisdom is another. Science is an edged tool, with which men play like children, and cut their own fingers.
Observation and theory get on best when they are mixed together, both helping one another in the pursuit of truth. It is a good rule not to put overmuch confidence in a theory until it has been confirmed by observation. I hope I shall not shock the experimental physicists too much if I add that it is also a good rule not to put overmuch confidence in the observational results that are put forward until they have been confirmed by theory.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!