Top 40 Quotes & Sayings by Ben Bradlee

Explore popular quotes and sayings by an American editor Ben Bradlee.
Last updated on November 7, 2024.
Ben Bradlee

Benjamin Crowninshield Bradlee was an American journalist who served as managing editor, then as executive editor of The Washington Post, from 1965 to 1991. He became a public figure when the Post joined The New York Times in publishing the Pentagon Papers and gave the go-ahead for the paper's extensive coverage of the Watergate scandal. He was also criticized for editorial lapses when the Post had to return a Pulitzer Prize in 1981 after it discovered its award-winning story was false.

Sure, some journalists use anonymous sources just because they're lazy and I think editors ought to insist on more precise identification even if they remain anonymous.
It took us about a day and a half to find out what had gone wrong.
I give Cronkite a whole lot of credit. — © Ben Bradlee
I give Cronkite a whole lot of credit.
The biggest difference between Kennedy and Nixon, as far as the press is concerned, is simply this: Jack Kennedy really liked newspaper people and he really enjoyed sparring with journalists.
The Nixon administration really put a lot of pressure on CBS not to run the second broadcast.
We were right about the slush fund. But Sloan did not testify about it to the Grand Jury.
I never believed that Nixon could fully resurrect himself. And the proof of that was in the obits.
Maybe some of today's papers have too many 'feel-good' features, but there is a lot of good news out there.
We made only one real mistake. And even then we were right.
I must be out of it, but I don't know any good journalists who have excused Clinton's problems.
They cut about seven minutes from that broadcast, but it was still vital to the story's momentum.
There have been as many investigative reporters on this newspaper working on Clinton's many problems as I can remember there were working on Watergate.
You never monkey with the truth.
The really tough thing would have been to decide to take Woodward and Bernstein off the story. They were carrying the coal for us - in that their stories were right.
I think he had a strange, passionate devotion to the truth and a horror at what he saw going on. — © Ben Bradlee
I think he had a strange, passionate devotion to the truth and a horror at what he saw going on.
If an investigative reporter finds out that someone has been robbing the store, that may be 'gotcha' journalism, but it's also good journalism.
The champagne was flowing like the Potomac in flood.
National security is a really big problem for journalists, because no journalist worth his salt wants to endanger the national security, but the law talks about anyone who endangers the security of the United States is going to go to jail. So, here you are, especially in the Pentagon. Some guy tells you something. He says that's a national security matter. Well, you're supposed to tremble and get scared and it never, almost never means the security of the national government. More likely to mean the security or the personal happiness of the guy who is telling you something.
There will always be leaks; in Washington, everywhere.
The first rough draft of history.
Sure, some journalists use anonymous sources just because they’re lazy, and I think editors ought to insist on more precise identification even if they remain anonymous.
I do worry about how newspapers respond to falling circulation figures. I'm not sure that the answer is for newspapers to try to cater to whatever seems to be the fad of the day.
I don’t want to disappoint too many people, but the number of interesting political, historical conversations we had, you could stick in your ear, it wasn't that many. We talked about friends, family and of course girls.
To hell with news! I'm no longer interested in news. I'm interested in causes. We don't print the truth. We don't pretend to print the truth. We print what people tell us. It's up to the public to decide what's true.
It's very hard to stand up to the government which is saying that publication will threaten national security. People don't seem to realize that reporters and editors know something about national security and care deeply about it.
It changes your life, the pursuit of truth.
It changes your life, the pursuit of truth, if you know that you have tried to find the truth and gone past the first apparent truth towards the real truth. It's very, it's very exciting.
Sometimes I am convinced there is nothing wrong with this country that couldn't be cured by the magical implantation of ethical standards on us all - leaders and followers. Until that becomes doable, the Center for Public Integrity is just about the best thing we have going for us.
Nothing's riding on this, except the First Amendment to the Constitution, freedom of the press and maybe the future of the country. Not that any of that matters, but if you guys f-k up again, I'm gonna get mad.
In the perfect world every source could be identified, but like the man said, "It's not a perfect world." — © Ben Bradlee
In the perfect world every source could be identified, but like the man said, "It's not a perfect world."
Those [Watergate] tapes are going to take me to my grave with a huge smile on my face.
As long as a journalist tells the truth, in conscience and fairness, it is not his job to worry about consequences. The truth is never as dangerous as a lie in the long run. I truly believe the truth sets men free.
There is nothing like daily journalism! Best damn job in the world!
As a child, one looks for compliments. As an adult, one looks for evidence of effectiveness.
Generals who can write always make me nervous.
It is my experience that most claims of national security are part of a campaign to avoid telling the truth.
Our best today; better tomorrow.
Everybody who talks to a newspaper has a motive. That's just a given. And good reporters always, repeat always, probe to find out what that motive is.
Hire people smarter than you are and encourage them to bloom.
The history of American politics is littered with bodies of people who took so pure a position that they had no clout at all. — © Ben Bradlee
The history of American politics is littered with bodies of people who took so pure a position that they had no clout at all.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!