Explore popular quotes and sayings by an English playwright Edward Bond.
Last updated on December 22, 2024.
Edward Bond is an English playwright, theatre director, poet, theorist and screenwriter. He is the author of some fifty plays, among them Saved (1965), the production of which was instrumental in the abolition of theatre censorship in the UK. Other well-received works include Narrow Road to the Deep North (1968), Lear (1971), The Sea (1973), The Fool (1975), Restoration (1981), and the War trilogy (1985). Bond is broadly considered among the major living dramatists but he has always been and remains highly controversial because of the violence shown in his plays, the radicalism of his statements about modern theatre and society, and his theories on drama.
When humanness is lost the radical difference between the bodies in the pit and people walking on the street is lost.
I don't think it's the job of theatre at the moment to provide political propaganda; that would be simplistic. We have to explore our situation further before we will understand it.
It seems to me that we are profoundly ignorant of ourselves.
It's politely assumed that democracy is a means of containing and restraining violence. But violence comes not from genes but from ideas.
If you engage people on a vital, important level, they will respond.
What I try to do in a play is put a problem on stage, head-on, without evasion.
You have to go to the ultimate situation in drama.
I'm interested in the real world.
Auschwitz is a place in which tragedy cannot occur.
But we are not in the world to be good but to change it.
The human mind is a dramatic structure in itself and our society is absolutely saturated with drama.
Violence is hidden within democratic structures because they are not radically democratic - Western democracy is merely a domestic convenience of consumerism.
I think there is no world without theatre.
Fifteen years ago I walked out of a production of one of my plays at the RSC because I decided it was a waste of time.
What Shakespeare and the Greeks were able to do was radically question what it meant to be a human being.
You have to learn the language of Hamlet.
Shakespeare has no answers for us at all.
It's wonderful to be able to sit down and write a play.
We are still living in the aftershock of Hiroshima, people are still the scars of history.
The Greeks said very, very extreme things in their tragedies.
Art is the close scrutiny of reality and therefore I put on the stage only those things that I know happen in our society.
In the end I think theatre has only one subject: justice.
Our unconscious is not more animal than our conscious, it is often even more human.
It's insulting to ask a dramatist what his view of his play is. I have no opinion.
First there was the theatre of people and animals, then of people and the devil. Now we need the theatre of people and people.
The one overall structure in my plays is language.
We may seem competent, but by the end of next century there will be new deserts, new ruins.
In the past goodness was always a collective experience. Then goodness became privatised.
Religion enabled society to organise itself to debate goodness, just as Greek drama had once done.
At the turn of the century theatre does not have to be prescriptive.
The theatre, our theatre, comes from the Greeks.
Whatever the economy needs to maintain itself, the government will do it.
Violence is never a solution in my plays, just as ultimately violence is never a solution in human affairs.
Humanity's become a product and when humanity is a product, you get Auschwitz and you get Chair.
I write plays not to make money, but to stop myself from going mad. Because it's my way of making the world rational to me.
Now, drama is quite useful at helping us to understand what our position is and, conversely, we might then understand why our theatre is being destroyed.
The truth has got to appear plausible on the stage.
I'm not interested in an imaginary world.
The English sent all their bores abroad, and acquired the Empire as a punishment.
All you now do is pursue your private objectives within society. Instead of us being a community, everybody is asked to seek their own personal ends. It's called competition. And competition is antagonism.
Our lives are awkward and fragile and we have only one thing to keep us sane: pity, and the man without pity is mad.
Our unconscious is not more animal than our conscious, it is often even more human
It's politely assumed that democracy is a means of containing and restraining violence. But violence comes not from genes but from ideas
In the end I think theatre has only one subject: justice
The truth has got to appear plausible on the stage
The one overall structure in my plays is language
I'm not interested in an imaginary world
The human mind is a dramatic structure in itself and our society is absolutely saturated with drama
It seems to me that we are profoundly ignorant of ourselves
Art is the expression of the conviction that we can have a rational relationship with the world and each other. It isn't the faith or hope that we can, it is the demonstration that we can.
It's insulting to ask a dramatist what his view of his play is. I have no opinion
As Shakespeare himself knew, the peace, the reconciliation that he created on the stage would not last an hour on the street.
I write about violence as naturally as Jane Austen wrote about manners. Violence shapes and obsesses our society, and if we do not stop being violent we have no future.
Shakespeare has no answers for us at all
Law and order is one of the steps taken to maintain injustice.
Now, drama is quite useful at helping us to understand what our position is and, conversely, we might then understand why our theatre is being destroyed