For me, novels coalesce into being, rather than arrive fully formed.
Loneliness is an integral part of travelling. I used to think it was the downside to travelling, but now I realise it is a necessary educative part of it to be embraced.
Sometimes, comics will make the observation that it's not jokes that are funny, it's characters that are funny. And isn't that true! That's why I always kill jokes. I'm terrible at them, because I get the joke right, but I can't get the character right, and it just goes down like a lead balloon.
When you're out of your own cultural context you have conversations with yourself that you just don't have at any other point in your life. When you're in a hotel room on the border between India and Nepal you can really discover things about yourself.
My books are anti-absolutist and deeply distrustful of any religious stance that precludes the validity of any other.
Every relationship has its own language. It takes a long time to evolve and read one another. Just as it's true for people, it's also true on a national or cultural level.
I'm certainly a plot and character man. Themes, structure, style - they're valid components of a novel and you can't complete the book without them. But I think what propels me as a reader is plot and character.
I rarely ever put my head above the rampart and see where this big lumbering behemoth called 'global literature' is going.
Writers are so used to books being optioned and then the movie never happens.
When I talk about my artist parents, people imagine a bohemian environment and think, 'Aha, so that's where he gets it from!' But we were as white, straight, and middle-class as the next family on our white, straight, middle-class housing estate.
Japanese food makes me feel particularly good.
I love HBO productions, actually, like 'The Wire.'
I've become a less brave traveller since I became a dad, but in the past I was more foolhardy than brave.
The words 'maybe' and 'perhaps' are literally the same - the flavor is the same, the educational level is the same. But you just know when to use maybe and when to use perhaps. I think it's because of this: You get to know the tastes or musical tastes of words themselves, and this informs your choice, whether you use them or not.
If the human condition were the periodic table, maybe love would be hydrogen at No. 1. Death would be helium at No. 2. Power, I reckon, would be where oxygen is.
'Y' is about the weakest letter of all. 'Y' can't make up its mind if it's a vowel or a consonant, can it?
I think all writers of my age who are brought up on films probably by the age of 16 have seen many more films than they have read classics of literature. We can't help but be influenced by film. Film has got some great tricks that it's taught writers.
Perhaps where text slides toward ambiguity, film inclines to specificity. A novel contains as many versions of itself as it has readers, whereas a film's final cut vaporizes every other way it might have been made.
I think we think in terms of stories.
I'm not from a milieu where high-register language or philosophical ideas were welcome.
When I think about it, I'm happily bewildered that people will preorder my books They'll preorder me. What a lucky guy!
I can't bear living in this huge beautiful world and not try to imitate it as best I can.
Your environment affects you wherever you are.
I think words operate like musical notes that the eyeball hears.
I often lose myself in the Sudoku-like challenges of making a book work.
A life can get knocked into a new orbit by a car crash, a lottery win or just a bleary-eyed consultant giving bad news in a calm voice.
I think the story is the most ancient form of human entertainment.
A novelist needs to know his own strong points and weak points.
In the 1970s and 1980s there was so little decent fiction for young people, but we're now in a golden age that shows no sign of fading. Philip Pullman, J. K. Rowling, Lemony Snicket are only three of the best known among a good number of equals.
Perhaps all human interaction is about wanting and getting.
It's true that stammerers can become more adept at sentence construction.
The art of the novelist is not unrelated to the illness of multiple personality disorder. It's a much milder form. But the better the book, the nearer to the padded cell you are.
I still haven't quite got used to eating live fish.
People like to say that East Asians in general, and Japanese in particular, are not very expressive: there's that term 'inscrutable.' But often, Europeans just don't get the Asian codes. Believe me, the message is being expressed OK.
The state of childhood resonates with life inside a fantasy novel. If you have no control over how you spend large chunks of your day, or are at the mercy of flawed giant beings, then the desire to bend the laws of the world by magic is strong and deep.
Any adaptation is a translation, and there is such a thing as an unreadably faithful translation; and I believe a degree of reinterpretation for the new language may be not only inevitable but desirable.
I'm from a time and place where bigheadedness was a really savage crime, and you'd get cut down for it by your peers and parents.
Write something every single day, even if it's just three lines. And it doesn't matter if it's any good - just write something every day.
Historically, unfortunately, race seems to be the major division that humanity has imposed on itself, a way of subdividing into smaller groups.
Writing is probably one-fifth coming up with the stuff, and four-fifths self-editing again and again and again.
I don't have problems starting writing. I have problems stopping. I'm one of the last dads to arrive at school to collect the kids, because I want to get this paragraph just right.
There's been very little writing about speech impediments, even though it's this huge psychological barrier.
Many children are natural fantasists, I think, perhaps because their imaginations have yet to be clobbered into submission by experience.
As long as our civilisation keeps trundling along generally forwards, then there is the possibility of a future where ethnicity is merely an interesting badge, not a uniform you can't take off.
When I was about 14, in about 1984, I decided to become a great poet. Faber & Faber was going to publish me, and when Ted Hughes read my first anthology he would invite me to Yorkshire for meat pies and mentorship.
I'm a novelist, that's how I make my livelihood, and I concentrate on the novels.
I'm not a great deep political thinker.
There's a disease that young writers are susceptible to, which is, I will do this because I can - hubris, I suppose - without stopping to work out why.
Sometimes I think that creativity is a matter of seeing, or stumbling over, unobvious similarities between things - like composing a fresh metaphor, but on a more complex scale.
I think it's natural for youth to be drawn to newness: The world is still new for them.
You can't be a part-time Richard Dawkins.
Our lives are not our own. We are bound to others, past and present, and by each crime and every kindness, we birth our future.
Once any tyranny becomes accepted as ordinary, its victory is assured.
You say you're 'depressed' - all i see is resilience. You are allowed to feel messed up and inside out. It doesn't mean you're defective - it just means you're human.
Books don't offer real escape, but they can stop a mind scratching itself raw.
My life amounts to no more than one drop in a limitless ocean. Yet what is any ocean, but a multitude of drops?
Love's pure free joy when it works, but when it goes bad you pay for the good hours at loan-shark prices.