Top 47 Quotes & Sayings by Terence Tao
Explore popular quotes and sayings by an Australian mathematician Terence Tao.
Last updated on November 22, 2024.
Mathematicians are fairly cheap.
Most students who take math classes aren't going to be mathematicians. They're going to be engineers, statisticians - in many ways, that's the more important mission of math education.
I often don't know what I'll be working on next year or a year from now. There is often a chance meeting, or something that I worked on 10 years ago suddenly becomes important again.
I always liked numbers.
You want to get to the top of the cliff. But that's not what you focus on immediately. You focus on the next ledge just beyond your reach, because you need to do one clever thing to get up there. And then, once you get there, you do it again. A lot of this is rather boring and not very glamorous. But you can't jump cliffs in a single bound.
When I was growing up, I knew I wanted to be a mathematician, but I had no idea what that entailed.
It is very humbling to receive the Fields Medal. The words of a Fields Medallist carry a lot of weight within mathematics - for instance, in framing future directions of research - which means that I have to watch what I say more carefully now!
In 1992, when I was 16, I moved to the United States to start working on my Ph.D. at Princeton University in New Jersey.
I tend to change research direction every few years or so.
The accuracy of Wikipedia can be dodgy in some places, but in maths, it's really quite good.
I was never very good at school with... humanities... anything which was more a matter of opinion.
Math research is more like a marathon.
I enjoy a good meal, a good vacation, or a good movie, much as anyone else would.
Research sometimes feels like an ongoing TV series in which some amazing revelations have already been made, but there are still plenty of cliff-hangers and unresolved plotlines that you want to see resolved. But unlike TV, we have to do the work ourselves to figure out what happens next.
Can you make fancy patterns of water that actually have some computation power? I'm betting that fluids are complex enough to do this.
I always liked situations where there were very clear rules of what to do.
There might be a hidden structure in pi that we simply haven't discovered.
I remember having this vague idea that what mathematicians did was that some authority, someone, gave them problems to solve, and they just sort of solved them.
Talent is important, but how one develops and nurtures it is even more so.
If I don't understand something properly, every single component, it really bugs me.
For me, I guess the main motivation is the satisfaction of finally understanding some tricky mathematical concept or phenomenon and then explaining it to others.
The standard high school curriculum traditionally has been focused towards physics and engineering. So calculus, differential equations, and linear algebra have always been the most emphasized, and for good reason - these are very important.
When I was seven or eight, whenever I was getting too rowdy at night, my parents would give me a maths workbook to work on to quieten me down.
If I experiment enough, I get a deeper understanding.
I don't like accepting things at face value.
One can think of any given axiom system as being like a computer with a certain limited amount of memory or processing power. One could switch to a computer with even more storage, but no matter how large an amount of storage space the computer has, there will still exist some tasks that are beyond its ability.
I recall being fascinated by numbers even at age three and viewed their manipulation as a kind of game.
Most of what I do does not save lives.
It was traditional to not actually cash the prizes that Erdos did award while he was alive. People usually framed the cheque instead.
I have been lucky to find very good collaborators who have taught me a lot, have introduced me to several new fields of mathematics, or have shown me new insights.
If there is something that I should know how to do but don't, it bugs me. I feel like I have to sit down and work out exactly what the problem is.
What interests me is the connection between maths and the real world.
Math education has changed over the years. In the 19th century, they taught spherical trigonometry because one of the biggest applications of mathematics was navigating the ocean. This is no longer so relevant.
I don't have any magical ability. I look at a problem, play with it, work out a strategy.
I still remember the realization in college at Flinders University in Australia that mathematics was not just an abstract game of symbols but could be used as a tool to analyze and understand the modern world.
A lot of the math that I do, it's not sort of premeditated. I talk online or with a colleague, and I get interested, and I just follow where it leads.
When you're concentrating hard, hours can fly by, and it's just you and a math problem.
I am still very fond of Australia, but my life is now in Los Angeles.
My life is more than just my work. I am a husband and a father and a proud citizen of two countries: my homeland of Australia and my adopted country here in the United States.
I think one nice thing about mathematics is that we don't really have one prize that dominates all the others, like the Nobel prizes.
Unsolicited surprise requests from strangers are essentially guaranteed to be met with a negative response.
Education is a complex, multifaceted, and painstaking process, and being gifted does not make this less so.
Ultimately you should follow advice not because someone tells you to, but because it was something that you already knew you should be doing.
Pointing out that countless great mathematicians had tried to solve the problem and failed before you came along is in particularly bad taste and should be avoided completely.
Volume grows spatially slower than scaling.
... it can often be profitable to try a technique on a problem even if you know in advance that it cannot possibly solve the problem completely.
At a purely formal level, one could call probability theory the study of measure spaces with total measure one, but that would be like calling number theory the study of strings of digits which terminate.
Related Authors
Ada Lovelace Quotes
English
Mathematician
Alfred North Whitehead Quotes
English
Mathematician
Benoit Mandelbrot Quotes
French
Mathematician
Carl Friedrich Gauss Quotes
German
Mathematician
Charles Babbage Quotes
English
Mathematician
David Hilbert Quotes
German
Mathematician
G. H. Hardy Quotes
British
Mathematician
George Polya Quotes
Hungarian
Mathematician
Hannah Fry Quotes
English
Mathematician
Henri Poincare Quotes
French
Mathematician
Isaac Barrow Quotes
English
Mathematician
Isaac Newton Quotes
English
Mathematician
Norbert Wiener Quotes
American
Mathematician
Pythagoras Quotes
Greek
Mathematician
Rene Descartes Quotes
French
Mathematician
Seymour Papert Quotes
American
Mathematician