A Quote by Alan Dershowitz

There's no evidence that I'm aware of that guns reduce crime. — © Alan Dershowitz
There's no evidence that I'm aware of that guns reduce crime.
You don't reduce crime by taking away guns from law-abiding citizens.
There is no evidence that having more guns reduces crime. None at All.
There's no evidence that I'm aware of that guns protect liberty.
One way to reduce crime and save lives is to target criminals who use guns with tough mandatory minimums.
There's zero evidence, empirical or anecdotal, that more guns leads to less gun crime.
Surveillance cameras might reduce crime - even though the evidence here is mixed - but no studies show that they result in greater happiness of everyone involved.
Gun control advocates used to claim that more guns meant more crime. Research demonstrated, though, that more guns meant less crime. As the criminology argument faded, gun control advocates began arguing guns were a public health problem.
If you reduce the guns and the ammo, you'll reduce the murders.
We know that the crime committed by people with guns by criminals, they get the guns by flouting the law to begin with. They don't go to gun shows.
A large part of crime is economics - if people are working and and have a home and family to support, then I believe you can reduce the crime rate.
Rather than following through on the proven crime and violence prevention techniques that work, we are back to tough-talking sound byte policies that have been proven to not only fail to reduce crime but actually increase crime, waste taxpayers' money and discriminate against minorities.
Leaking classified information is a crime. And if we have evidence that somebody in the executive branch is committing a crime, we should prosecute that person.
Giving a 10-year mandatory minimum for a second offense fist fight is not going to reduce the chance that someone will be stabbed 16 times when you are not funding any of the programs that are desperately needed to actually reduce juvenile crime.
Crime is actually less in places where people own guns. Washington, D.C., is a case in point. It has the strictest gun laws, but who has the highest crime rate in the country? Washington, D.C.
We don't have storm troopers that just knock on the door of every American citizen. We don't do that for any crime. But when we have evidence that a particular person has committed a crime, we send law enforcement to apprehend them.
As the data from the past decade clarify, there is no evidence that poverty causes crime but a great deal of evidence that crime causes poverty. By aligning themselves against the police, against commonsense tactics like stop and frisk, against metal detectors in public housing, against swift and certain punishment, and for a broad array of legal protections for accused criminals, liberals helped to aggrieve the lives of the poor and society as a whole.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!