Hinduism dies if untouchability lives, and untouchability has to die if Hinduism is to live.
If untouchability lives, Hinduism perishes and even India perishes, but if untouchability is eradicated from the Hindu heart, root and branch, then Hinduism has a definite message for the world.
The removal of untouchability is a question of the purification of Hinduism.
The untouchability of Hinduism is probably worse than that of the modern imperialists.
Untouchability is a blot on Hinduism. It is a canker eating into its vitals.
If untouchability is an integral part of Hinduism, the latter is a spent bullet.
I would far rather that Hinduism died than that untouchability lived.
To remove untouchability is a penance that caste Hindus owe to Hinduism and to themselves.
Men like me feel that untouchability is no integral part of Hinduism, it is an excrescence.
No stone should be left unturned to bring home to the family members that untouchability is a sin and a blot on Hinduism.
So long as untouchability disfigures Hinduism, so long do I hold the attainment of Swaraj to be an utter impossibility.
The more I study Hindu scriptures, and the more I discuss them with Brahmins, the more I feel convinced that untouchability is the greatest blot upon Hinduism.
Untouchability of foreign cloth is as much a virtue with all of us as untouchability of the suppressed classes must be a sin with every devout Hindu.
He who has never sinned is less reliable than he who has only sinned once.
Hinduism has absorbed the best of all the faiths of the world and in that sense Hinduism is not an exclusive religion.
Nor can the Apostle mean that Eve only sinned; or that she only was Deceived, for if Adam sinned willfully and knowingly, he became the greater Transgressor.