A Quote by Sally Rooney

I'm not sure that the culture of literary prizes is always a good thing, but while there are literary prizes, it's nice to be nominated. — © Sally Rooney
I'm not sure that the culture of literary prizes is always a good thing, but while there are literary prizes, it's nice to be nominated.
Literary prizes serve a purpose if they allow for discussion of books.
The book trade invented literary prizes to stimulate sales, not to reward merit.
Generally, literary prizes are significant not for who the winner is but the discussion they create around books.
I am, of course, greatly honoured to win the Booker, which is one of the great literary prizes in the world.
The literary culture, if you examine it, the high literary culture is that which preserves the government and you know it's really the talk for those who have.
I've been very lucky with prizes. But the thing about prizes is that, when you talk about a prize-winning author, you can be talking about one that is well-regarded but doesn't sell any books.
No more prizes for predicting the rain, only prizes for building the arks
Nobel prizes are very special prizes, and it would be great to get one.
It is impossible to win the great prizes of life without running risks, and the greatest of all prizes are those connected with the home.
There may be certain genres that men dominate, but fiction not so much. The question of prizes is tricky because there are so many prizes.
I was excited to be nominated for the Grammy, but prizes are a little strange.
One of the realities for women writers is that sometimes you'll start strong, but as you see people go up the ladder, working in their literary lives, getting prizes and awards and the better teaching gigs, women tend to sort of drop away.
Prizes aren't essential. What is essential is poetry itself, it's what is said, it is clarity, it's loyalty, those are the essential values, the literary values.
I’m not club-able, you see. I don’t like literary parties and literary gatherings and literary identities. I’d hate to join anything, however loosely.
The Booker thing was a catalyst for me in a bizarre way. It’s perceived as an accolade to be published as a ‘literary’ writer, but, actually, it’s pompous and it’s fake. Literary fiction is often nothing more than a genre in itself. I’d always read omnivorously and often thought much literary fiction is read by young men and women in their 20s, as substitutes for experience.
Prizes are like butterflies, colorful butterflies that fly away. I don't believe in prizes much.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!