A Quote by Sharice Davids

No one is above the law, not even the President. — © Sharice Davids
No one is above the law, not even the President.
The Democrats keep repeating over and over again, 'the President is not above the law.' I've said it before, 'the President is not above the law' but he damn sure shouldn't be below it either.
She [Justice sandra Day O'Connor] wrote - and this is one we should all remember - she wrote that even war is not a blank check for the president when it comes to the rights of the nation's citizens. She held that even this president is not above the law.
No one is above the law, not even the president. I believe perjury does meet at least the definition of high misdemeanor.
In our system of government, the president is not supposed to be above the law. He is not a king; his word is not the law.
People - pardon me, journalists and politicians - have often accused me of believing that I'm above the law. And yet, who isn't? Everywhere you prod it, even with the shortest stick, the established system isn't simply corrupt, it's unequivocally putrescent. The law is created by demonstrable criminals, enforced by demonstrable, interpreted by demonstrable criminals, all for demonstrably criminal purposes. Of course I'm above the law. And so are you.
Of course no president, Democratic or Republican - no president - is above the law, as neither are you, nor I, nor anyone.
The integrity of our government, our Republic, fundamentally relies on the principle that no person, not even the president or the nation's chief law enforcement officer, is above our laws.
I was raised to believe nobody is above the law - especially not a president.
This is a case if the President is permitted to be above the law, then we no longer have a republic.
Impeachment is our system's last resort for someone who treats himself or herself as above the law, the most relevant thing is whether this president, by his recent course of action, on top of his violations of the foreign corruption or emoluments clause, this president has shone that he cannot be trusted to remain within the law and our constitution's last resort for situations of that kind is to get the person out of office.
I do not agree with the use of 'signing statements' to effectively act as a line-item veto, except when the President believes a law or a provision within a law is unconstitutional.In general, if a President signs a law, they are committing themselves to enforcing it. If they don't believe it should become a law, they should veto it.
I believe we should follow the text of every law, even (a) law I disagree with, it's one of the real differences -- if you look at President Obama and the lawlessness, if he disagrees with a law he simply refuses to follow it or claims the authority to unilaterally change.
I am charged with violating pledges which I never gave; and because I execute what I believe to be the law, with usurping powers not conferred by law; and above all, with using the powers conferred upon the President by the Constitution, from corrupt motives and for unwarrantable ends.
If I am not above the law, nobody in this country can then claim to be above the law.
We are a nation of laws. And nobody can ignore our Constitution. No one's above the law. And that includes the president of the United States.
In England Parliament is above the law. In America the law is above Congress.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!