A Quote by Thomas Jefferson

An elective despotism was not the government we fought for. — © Thomas Jefferson
An elective despotism was not the government we fought for.
An elective despotism was not the government we fought for, but one which should not only be founded on true free principles, but in which the powers of government should be so divided and balanced among general bodies of magistracy, as that no one could transcend their legal limits without being effectually checked and restrained by the others.
It is not because a part of the government is elective, that makes it less a despotism, if the persons so elected, possess afterwards, as a parliament, unlimited powers. Election, in this case, becomes separated from representation, and the candidates are candidates for despotism.
It has been said that terror is the principle of despotic government. Does your government therefore resemble despotism? Yes, as the sword that gleams in the hands of the heroes of liberty resembles that with which the henchmen of tyranny are armed ... The government of the revolution is liberty's despotism against tyranny.
Government is frequently and aptly classed under two descriptions-a government of force, and a government of laws; the first is the definition of despotism-the last, of liberty.
Whatever government is not a government of laws, is a despotism, let it be called what it may.
Democracy has two excesses to avoid: the spirit of inequality, which leads to an aristocracy, or to the government of a single individual; and the spirit of extreme equality, which conducts it to despotism, as the despotism of a single individual finishes by conquest.
Socialism is the phantastic younger brother of despotism, which it wants to inherit. Socialism wants to have the fullness of state force which before only existed in despotism. ... However, it goes further than anything in the past because it aims at the formal destruction of the individual ... who ... can be used to improve communities by an expedient organ of government.
Workers organized and fought for worker rights and food safety, Social Security and Medicare - they fought to change government. And they won.
[O]ur sages in the great [constitutional] convention... intended our government should be a republic which differs more widely from a democracy than a democracy from a despotism. The rigours of a despotism often... oppress only a few, but it is the very essence and nature of a democracy, for a faction claiming to oppress a minority, and that minority the chief owners of the property and truest lovers of their country.
"Our government will soon become what it is already a long way toward becoming, an elective dictatorship.
Despotism has forever had a powerful hold upon the world. Autocratic government, not self-government, has been the prevailing state of mankind. The record of past history is the record, not of the success of republics, but of their failure.
So long as war is the main business of nations, temporary despotism - despotism during the campaign - is indispensable.
Is not liberty the destruction of all despotism - including, of course, legal despotism?
The revolutionary government is the despotism of liberty against tyranny
The revolutionary government is the despotism of liberty against tyranny.
The despotism of will in ideas is styled plan, project, character, obstinacy; its despotism in desires is called passion.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!