A Quote by William J. Mitchell

Photography is and is not a language; language also is and is not a photography. — © William J. Mitchell
Photography is and is not a language; language also is and is not a photography.
The meaning of quality in photography's best pictures lies written in the language of vision. That language is learned by chance, not system.
I like to think of Photography 1.0 as the invention of photography. Photography 2.0 is digital technology and the move from film and paper to everything on a chip. Photography 3.0 is the use of the camera, space, and color and to capture an object in the third dimension.
We believe we can also show that words do not have exactly the same psychic "weight" depending on whether they belong to the language of reverie or to the language of daylight life-to rested language or language under surveillance-to the language of natural poetry or to the language hammered out by authoritarian prosodies.
Although photography generates works that can be called art-it requires subjectivity, it can lie, it gives aesthetic pleasure-photography is not, to begin with, an art form at all. Like language, it is a medium in which works of art (among other things) are made.
The language that photography has is a formal language. Any photographer is doing something formal. If it's formal, then it must be an aesthetic way to communicate.
I collect art on a very modest scale. Most of what I have is photography because I just love it and it makes me happy and it looks good in my home. I also have a pretty big collection of art books mainly, again, on photography. A lot of photography monographs, which is great because with photography, the art itself can be reproduced quite well in book form.
First you study photography, then you practice photography, then you serve photography, and finally one becomes photography.
When I was in the 12th standard itself, I decided to join the Adyar Film Institute and study photography. I specifically chose photography because I see photography as an applied science. There is an artistic element also in it. If you perfect your scientific element, you can attain certain quality.
Photography is my only language.
I don't hate language. I have my own language, but I also enjoy the English language. Obviously, you don't read a lot of literature and not care about language.
Now that photography is a digital medium, the ghost of painting is coming to haunt it: photography no longer retains a sense of truth. I think that's great, because it frees photography from factuality, the same way photography freed painting from factuality in the mid-nineteenth century.
I'm not a religious person. The language of photography is symbolic.
One advantage of photography is that it's visual and can transcend language.
Computer photography won't be photography as we know it. I think photography will always be chemical.
Photography promises an enhanced mastery of nature, but photography also threatens conflagration and anarchy.
I'm very interested in the language of photography in relationship to painting.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!