A Quote by Al Gore

We need to put a price on carbon. This needs to be a priority for all of us in how we vote. — © Al Gore
We need to put a price on carbon. This needs to be a priority for all of us in how we vote.
Government needs to do two things: put a price on carbon and invest heavily in new technologies.
We need the world to put a price on carbon.
I think we need to price carbon; there's no question about it. The way we do it needs to be based on science and not political debates and attacks, and that's why I'm drawing on experts and best practices from around the world.
We hear people talk about putting a price on carbon, but they won't talk about how much that price of carbon is.
The key is to vote because we need a vote to put the people in power that we want to represent us.
If you want to put a price on carbon why not just do it with a simple tax?
When you buy carbon offsets, you pay to take planet-warming carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere in exchange for the greenhouse gases you put in. For example, you can put money toward replanting trees, which absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
I felt like my vote was the vote that put [Obama] into office. It was down to one vote, and that was going to be my vote. And that may not be true, but that's how much power it felt like I had.
Many scientists and economists also say putting a price on carbon through carbon taxes and/or cap-and-trade is necessary.
We need to put a price on carbon, and that's what cap-and-trade does and that's also what a CO2 tax does. As long as our current valuation in the marketplace tells us every minute of every day that it's perfectly all right to dump 90 million tons of global warming into the thin atmosphere surrounding the planet every 24 hours as if that atmosphere is an open sewer, then the individual actions are not going to solve the problem.
I think when it comes to climate change, the single most important thing in the world is for the United States' Congress to pass an effective bill that will put a price in carbon because if it starts costing something to emit carbon, this will provide an incentive, people do act on the basis to some extent of economic incentives to emit fewer greenhouse gases.
We have for many years included a price of carbon in our outlook. We put it in as a cost. Everything gets tested against it.
If there's one thing I would like to see, it'd be for us to be able to price the cost of carbon emissions.
For carbon-neutral cities, there are things worth talking about in how our consumption patterns can change - sharing goods, etc. - but those are a fraction of the impacts of transportation and building energy use. If we need to choose priority actions, the most important things are to densify, provide transit, and green the buildings.
The struggle against poverty in the world and the challenge of cutting wealthy country emissions all has a single, very simple solution... Here it is: Put a price on carbon.
Canadians didn't vote for a carbon tax. Justin Trudeau campaigned, promised that he wouldn't create a carbon tax.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!