A Quote by Alex Stamos

The definition of hate speech in some countries is problematic. — © Alex Stamos
The definition of hate speech in some countries is problematic.
If a university official's letter accusing a speaker of having a proclivity to commit speech crimes before she's given the speech - which then leads to Facebook postings demanding that Ann Coulter be hurt, a massive riot and a police-ordered cancellation of the speech - is not hate speech, then there is no such thing as hate speech.
There is a fine line between free speech and hate speech. Free speech encourages debate whereas hate speech incites violence.
Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by definition, needs no protection.
Some countries you love. Some countries you hate. Canada is a country you worry about.
A boring speech can be just a boring speech. But a speech with a joke that falls flat is awful. I hate it. That's why I think it's easier to hate a comedy. If a drama doesn't land, it's boring; if a joke doesn't land - you hate that.
Hate radio, hate speech, hate groups, hate crimes really don't fit in, in the America that we know today.
My company has no intention of deleting constitutionally protected hate speech. I feel the remedy for this type of speech is counter speech, and I'm certain that this is the view of the American justice system.
Wherever the relevance of speech is at stake, matters become political by definition, for speech is what makes man a political being.
In most Western democracies, you do have the freedom of speech. But freedom of speech is not an entitlement to reach. You are free to say what you want, within the confines of hate speech, libel law and so on. But you are not entitled to have your voice artificially amplified by technology.
The reality is that [Barack] Obama has some 15 countries in the current Libya coalition. President Bush put together close to 50 countries for the Afghan coalition, some 40 countries for the Iraqi coalition, more than 90 countries for the Proliferation Security Initiative and over 90 countries in the Global War on Terror.
The current total of countries in the world with First Amendments is one. You have guaranteed freedom of speech. Other countries don't have that.
We have ways to protect the public when free speech crosses over in hate speech.
Together, we must all remember that one of the most effective responses to hate speech is more speech.
Hate speech and freedom of speech are two different things.
Free speech should never mean hate speech.
Free speech is meaningless unless it tolerates the speech that we hate.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!