A Quote by Ali Larijani

Reporting Iran's dossier to the UN security council will be unconstructive and the end of diplomacy. — © Ali Larijani
Reporting Iran's dossier to the UN security council will be unconstructive and the end of diplomacy.
If the nuclear dossier is referred to the U. N. Security Council, Iran will have to resume uranium enrichment.
Diplomacy is the only clear answer to the current situation. There is no legal basis for referring Iran to the Security Council. But if that were to happen Iran is not afraid.
When diplomacy has been exhausted, the Security Council must become involved. Questions about Iran's nuclear activities remain unanswered, despite repeated efforts by the IAEA.
The Security Council decided to deal with Iran's nuclear intentions. The international community will not be willing to tolerate an Iran with a nuclear capability and an Iran that collaborates with terrorist organizations.
Those who insist on transferring the Iranian nuclear dossier to the UN Security Council have received an additional argument for doing so.
Whether we report Iran to the council or not, I believe the only way forward is through diplomacy.
In order for the U.N. to be effective, there must be consequences if people thumb their nose at the United Nations Security Council. And we will work with people on the Security Council to achieve that objective.
The United States must also continue to push the United Nations Security Council for strong action to thwart Iran's nuclear ambitions. In the meantime, it is our job to take meaningful steps to eliminate the threats posed by Iran.
There's a sense that we've obtained from various quarters in the Security Council that the notion of an international tribunal is not really practical. Certainly Indonesia is not convinced, and we get a sense that the rest of the Security Council will need to be convinced about the recommendations.
To go to war without the Security Council will not be in conformity with the Council.
Beijing would indeed consider vetoing any American effort to sanction Iran at the Security Council.
No American ambassador has produced more Security Council Resolutions on the issue of Iran than John Bolton.
Engaging in diplomacy with Iran and putting an end to their nuclear weapons program was the right thing to do.
The unfair composition of the Security Council is largely acknowledged. The principal defects are the anachronistic privileges of the five permanent members of the Council and the Council's insufficient representativeness.
The purposes of the United States should not be doubted. The Security Council resolutions will be enforced - the just demands of peace and security will be met - or action will be unavoidable. And a regime that has lost its legitimacy will also lose its power.
The Trump administration has done some bad stuff in the international realm, picking needless fights with allies like Mexico and Australia, even using some idiotic and intemperate language about Iran, but there was one thing they did about Iran that I agree with. Which is if Iran is testing anti-ballistic missiles, it's in violation of a UN Security Council resolution. And we can't ignore that ... And they did condemn the anti-ballistic missile test. And I think they're right about that.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!