A Quote by Andre Kertesz

Photography is my only language. — © Andre Kertesz
Photography is my only language.
Photography is the only language that can be understood anywhere in the world.
Photography is and is not a language; language also is and is not a photography.
Photography is the only "language" understood in all parts of the world, and, bridging all nations and cultures, it links the family of man.
The meaning of quality in photography's best pictures lies written in the language of vision. That language is learned by chance, not system.
The earliest language was body language and, since this language is the language of questions, if we limit the questions, and if we only pay attention to or place values on spoken or written language, then we are ruling out a large area of human language.
I like to think of Photography 1.0 as the invention of photography. Photography 2.0 is digital technology and the move from film and paper to everything on a chip. Photography 3.0 is the use of the camera, space, and color and to capture an object in the third dimension.
It was only after a while, after photographing mines and clear-cutting of forests in Maine, that I realized I was looking at the components of photography itself. Photography uses paper made from trees, water, metals, and chemistry. In a way, I was looking at all these things that feed into photography.
Although photography generates works that can be called art-it requires subjectivity, it can lie, it gives aesthetic pleasure-photography is not, to begin with, an art form at all. Like language, it is a medium in which works of art (among other things) are made.
The language that photography has is a formal language. Any photographer is doing something formal. If it's formal, then it must be an aesthetic way to communicate.
Language is decanted and shared. If only one person is left alive speaking a language - the case with some American Indian languages - the language is dead. Language takes two and their multiples.
First you study photography, then you practice photography, then you serve photography, and finally one becomes photography.
The fundamental issue is one of emphasis: you are not a photographer because you are interested in photography...The reason is that photography is only a tool, a vehicle, for expressing or transmitting a passion in something else. It is not the end result.
Now that photography is a digital medium, the ghost of painting is coming to haunt it: photography no longer retains a sense of truth. I think that's great, because it frees photography from factuality, the same way photography freed painting from factuality in the mid-nineteenth century.
One advantage of photography is that it's visual and can transcend language.
I'm not a religious person. The language of photography is symbolic.
Computer photography won't be photography as we know it. I think photography will always be chemical.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!