I imagine you already know that I am much more socialistic in my economic theory than capitalistic. And yet I am not so opposed to capitalism that I have failed to see its relative merits. It started out with a noble and high motive, to block the trade monopolies of nobles, but like most human systems it falls victim to the very thing it was revolting against. So today capitalism has outlived its usefulness. It has brought about a system that takes necessities from the masses to give luxuries to the classes.
Avoid the philosophy and excuse that yesterday's luxuries have become today's necessities. They aren't necessities unless we ourselves make them such. . . . It is essential for us to live within our means.
Men aren't necessities, they're luxuries.
Men aren't necessities. They're luxuries.
Give me the luxuries and I can dispense with the necessities.
The luxuries of the few were becoming necessities of the many.
Give us the luxuries of life, and we will dispense with its necessities.
When we turn luxuries into necessities, we jeopardize our ability for contentedness.
O America, how you've taken necessities from the masses to give luxuries to the classes.
Give me the luxuries of life and I will willingly do without the necessities.
In the affluent society, no useful distinction can be made between luxuries and necessities.
Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them humanity cannot survive.
Positive emotions are not trivial luxuries, but instead might be critical necessities for optimal functioning.
Sufficient sleep, exercise, healthy food, friendship, and peace of mind are necessities, not luxuries.
Although we sometimes did without a few of life's necessities, we rarely lacked for its luxuries.
Somehow we are going to have to develop a concept of enough for those at the top and at the bottom so that the necessities of the many are not sacrificed for the luxuries of the few.