A Quote by Bill Flores

I have disagreements with leadership, I have disagreements with the speaker, but I have those one-on-one. — © Bill Flores
I have disagreements with leadership, I have disagreements with the speaker, but I have those one-on-one.
Of course, there were huge disagreements in the arguments of military intervention, .. There is no point at the moment on focusing on those disagreements.
You don't want to have any disagreements with a friend, you know? Not disagreements that become public record and that you still have to answer questions about 10 years later.
A delusion that encourages belief where there is no evidence is asking for trouble. Disagreements between incompatible beliefs cannot be settled by reasoned argument because reasoned argument is drummed out of those trained in religion from the cradle. Instead, disagreements are settled by other means which, in extreme cases, inevitably become violent. Scientists disagree among themselves but they never fight over their disagreements. They argue about evidence or go out and seek new evidence. Much the same is true of philosophers, historians and literary critics.
It's true we have our disagreements on border issues, we have disagreements on trade and related issues, but you don't go invading a country whenever you have a dispute on trade issues, ... We have more civilized mechanisms on resolving such problems.
I have never tried to bear a judgment against my own father because I consider that, in our European culture, one does not judge his parents. Now, I have expressed my disagreements with my father on certain points, disagreements related to the way one should express things, something that has also to do with a difference of generations.
I have disagreements with some and more agreements with others. But that doesn't mean I cannot listen to those I disagree with.
Religion is unusual among divisive labels in being spectacularly unnecessary. If religious beliefs had any evidence going for them, we might have to respect them in spite of their concomitant unpleasantness. But there is no such evidence. To label people as death-deserving enemies because of disagreements about real world politics is bad enough. To do the same for disagreements about a delusional world inhabited by archangels, demons and imaginary friends is ludicrously tragic.
We may have our own ideas in the writing and editing stages, but we work out those disagreements in a constructive way.
Even when there's disagreements politically or among veterans or among advocacy organizations, let's agree to do that respectfully and show care and compassion to those who have served us.
Doing what you thought was right for the country, rather than what was politically expedient, seems almost as quaint now as having civil disagreements with those whose viewpoints differ from your own.
Most disagreements are the result of faulty assumptions.
Disagreements are one of the fundamental positive aspects of science.
Disagreements over money are the biggest cause of divorce.
Disagreements don't cause disunity, a lack of forgiveness does.
Wherever you have people, you have factions and disagreements and personality conflicts.
There have been major disagreements within the European Union.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!