A Quote by Carl Sagan

With insufficient data it is easy to go wrong. — © Carl Sagan
With insufficient data it is easy to go wrong.
Any time scientists disagree, it's because we have insufficient data. Then we can agree on what kind of data to get; we get the data; and the data solves the problem. Either I'm right, or you're right, or we're both wrong. And we move on. That kind of conflict resolution does not exist in politics or religion.
A conspiracy theorist is a person who tacitly admits that they have insufficient data to prove their points. A conspiracy is a battle cry of a person with insufficient data.
There is as yet insufficient data for a meaningful answer.
[Sherlock Holmes:] The temptation to form premature theories upon insufficient data is the bane of our profession.
In my view, our approach to global warming exemplifies everything that is wrong with our approach to the environment. We are basing our decisions on speculation, not evidence. Proponents are pressing their views with more PR than scientific data. Indeed, we have allowed the whole issue to be politicized-red vs blue, Republican vs Democrat. This is in my view absurd. Data aren't political. Data are data. Politics leads you in the direction of a belief. Data, if you follow them, lead you to truth.
Go out and collect data and, instead of having the answer, just look at the data and see if the data tells you anything. When we're allowed to do this with companies, it's almost magical.
If the data do not prove that indexing wins, well, the data are wrong.
I had ... come to an entirely erroneous conclusion, which shows, my dear Watson, how dangerous it always is to reason from insufficient data.
Life is made up of a series of judgments on insufficient data, and if we waited to run down all our doubts, it would flow past us.
Here is a guiding principle: If a business collects data on consumers electronically, it should provide them with a version of that data that is easy to download and export to another Web site.
People believe the best way to learn from the data is to have a hypothesis and then go check it, but the data is so complex that someone who is working with a data set will not know the most significant things to ask. That's a huge problem.
It's easy to hire too fast and have chaos and disorganization and insufficient management.
I was born with the wrong sign In the wrong house With the wrong ascendancy I took the wrong road That led to The wrong tendencies I was in the wrong place At the wrong time For the wrong reason And the wrong rhyme On the wrong day Of the wrong week Used the wrong method With the wrong technique Wrong Wrong.
It is wrong always, everywhere, and for everyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence.
It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence.
You can use data wrong. It's just like polling. There have been a lot of politicians who go conduct a poll to figure out what they believe.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!