A Quote by Charlie Chaplin

I don't believe that the public knows what it wants; this is the conclusion that I have drawn from my career. — © Charlie Chaplin
I don't believe that the public knows what it wants; this is the conclusion that I have drawn from my career.
The public never knows what he wants, but he always wants what he knows.
The terminology of philosophical art is coercive: arguments are powerful and best when they are knockdown, arguments force you to a conclusion, if you believe the premisses you have to or must believe the conclusion, some arguments do not carry much punch, and so forth. A philosophical argument is an attempt to get someone to believe something, whether he wants to beleive it or not. A successful philosophical argument, a strong argument, forces someone to a belief.
I'm not sure the public knows what it wants.
We work for the public, and I believe that if a senator wants to block a piece of legislation or a nominee, they owe the public an explanation.
For me, one of the great tragedies is the conclusion studios have drawn about traditional animation. I believe that 2D animation could be just as vital as it ever was. I think the problem has been with the stories.
Whereas the town knows all about you already and wants to know more and wants to beat you with what it knows till how can you have any of yourself left at all?
That is a big turn-on for me, a director who knows what he's doing and what he wants, and knows when he's gotten what he wants.
A man who first tried to guess 'what the public wants,' and then preached that as Christianity because the public wants it, would be a pretty mixture of fool and knave
How can one be compassionate if you belong to any religion, follow any guru, believe in something, believe in your scriptures, and so on, attached to a conclusion? When you accept your guru, you have come to a conclusion, or when you strongly believe in god or in a saviour, this or that, can there be compassion? You may do social work, help the poor out of pity, out of sympathy, out of charity, but is all that love and compassion?
In my mind, there's no logical conclusion that can be drawn, other than that I was fired for my activism.
I used to believe the purpose in life is to find happiness. I don’t believe that anymore. I believe we are all given gifts from our Father, and that our purpose is to offer them to Him. He knows how He wants us to use them.
No film should try to follow a trend, and do what film people think the public wants. There's no such thing as knowing what the public wants.
I think that the public is in and the public is in big, and the public is not, I don't think going to pull out because the public knows what I said about 1987.
Without the ability of issue groups to tell the truth, who knows what the public will believe.
As Lent is the time for greater love, listen to Jesus' thirst...'Repen t and believe' Jesus tells us. What are we to repent? Our indifference, our hardness of heart. What are we to believe? Jesus thirsts even now, in your heart and in the poor -- He knows your weakness. He wants only your love, wants only the chance to love you.
A metaphysical conclusion is either a false conclusion or a concealed experimental conclusion.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!