A Quote by Charlotte Bronte

Poverty, for me, is synonymous with degradation. — © Charlotte Bronte
Poverty, for me, is synonymous with degradation.
Poverty doesn't bring unhappiness; it brings degradation.
Poverty does not produce unhappiness: It produces degradation.
From a planning perspective, economic degradation begets environmental degradation, which begets social degradation.
Poverty, ignorance and degradation are the combined evils, these constitute the social disease of the free colored people of the US.
what about Christianity? Are we right in the face of so long a record of its poverty in international achievement, to keep invoking it as a standard, almost synonymous with civilization?
It's clear that agriculture, done right, is the best means the world has today to simultaneously tackle food security, poverty and environmental degradation.
To make 'depression' synonymous with 'dangerous' is as bad as saying 'Muslim' is synonymous with 'terrorist.'
Obviously, like Wembley is synonymous with tennis, snooker is synonymous with Sheffield.
All our efforts to defeat poverty and pursue sustainable development will be in vain if environmental degradation and natural resource depletion continue unabated.
What is quite worrisome is the absence of analysis and reflection. Take the word "terrorism." It has become synonymous now with anti-Americanism, which, in turn, has become synonymous with being critical of the United States, which, in turn, has become synonymous with being unpatriotic. That's an unacceptable series of equations.
There can be no peace as long as there is grinding poverty, social injustice, inequality, oppression, environmental degradation, and as long as the weak and small continue to be trodden by the mighty and powerful.
The essential role of the environment is still marginal in discussions about poverty. While we continue to debate these initiatives, environmental degradation, including the loss of biodiversity and topsoil, accelerates, causing development efforts to falter.
Many say our world is at a tipping point. If we do not act together, if we do not act responsibly, if we do not act now, we risk slipping into a cycle of poverty, degradation, and despair.
Quantitative methods are no more synonymous with objectivity than qualitative methods are synonymous with subjectivity.
However important the struggle is and however much misery and poverty and degradation exist, we know that it cannot be more important than one human life.
Why do people think that we’re degraded when we’re examining positions of degradation, or examining the cycle of our own degradation?
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!