A Quote by Daniel Morgan
We know that government intervention in the free market, and Argentine history has shown this, absolutely ends in a boomerang.
Quote Topics
Quote Author
Related Quotes
Let's face a historical truth: we have never had a "free market", we have always had government intervention in the economy, and indeed that intervention has been welcomed by the captains of finance and industry. They had no quarrel with "big government" when it served their needs.
There is still a tendency to regard any existing government intervention as desirable, to attribute all evils to the market, and to evaluate new proposals for government control in their ideal form, as they might work if run by able, disinterested men free from the pressure of special interest groups.
The great virtue of a free market is that it enables people who hate each other, or who are from vastly different religious or ethnic backgrounds, to cooperate economically. Government intervention can't do that.
Contrary to the vision of the left, it was the free market which produced affordable housing - before government intervention made housing unaffordable.
All the evils, abuses, and iniquities, popularly ascribed to businessmen and to capitalism, were not caused by an unregulated economy or by a free market, but by government intervention into the economy.
Even Milton Friedman - doyen of radical free market thought - was willing to consider some government intervention into primary education on the grounds that it is unfair for children to not get a chance in life because they were born to poor parents.
As history has shown, pure science research ultimately ends up applying to something. We just don't know it at the time.
In the whole history of capitalism, no one has been able to establish a coercive monopoly by means of competition in a free market...Every single coercive monopoly that exists or ever has existed...was created and made possible only by an act of government...which granted special privileges (not obtainable in a free market) to a man or a group of men, and forbade all others to enter that particular field.
I started out by viewing the marketplace as a cruel place, where you need intervention by government and lawyers to protect people. But after watching the regulators work, I have come to believe that markets are magical and the best protectors of the consumer. It is my job to explain the beauties of the free market.
Basically, the myth is that America has been founded on the free market; the government has done very little; it has thrived under free trade. But actually, if you look at the history, this is actually the country that has succeeded most with protectionist policies.
We no longer have a free market in the United States, we have a government controlled free market.
The larger the government, the more our livings standards are reduced. We are fortunate as a civilization that the progress of free enterprise generally outpaces the regress of government growth, for, if that were not the case, we would be poorer each year - not just in relative terms, but absolutely poorer too. The market is smart and the government is dumb, and to these attributes do we owe the whole of our economic well-being.
One of the great things about a free market is that it's inherently and indefatigably Darwinistic. Left to its own devices, a free market will eventually weed out the stupid from both 'ends' of the food chain otherwise described as supply and demand. As money is liberated from the hands of the stupid, those who would sell products or services to the stupid will eventually lose their share of the marketplace. Devoid of any 'benevolent' interference from government, the process is gloriously relentless, and cannot help but yield a successively smarter class of participants.
If, for example, existing government intervention is minor, we shall attach a smaller weight to the negative effect of additional government intervention. This is an important reason why many earlier liberals, like Henry Simons, writing at a time when government was small by today's standards, were willing to have government undertake activities that today's liberals would not accept now that government has become so overgrown.
Nationalization of private debts undermines prudential lender behavior and is a government intervention in the market.
As soon as a handful of scientists come up with an intervention shown to influence aging in other species, they begin selling it as an intervention for humans, even though there may not be evidence it works.
Related Authors
Ant Middleton Quotes
English
Soldier
Brandon Webb Quotes
American
Soldier
Chiang Kai-shek Quotes
Chinese
Soldier
Chris Kyle Quotes
American
Soldier
Dakota Meyer Quotes
American
Soldier
Kyle Carpenter Quotes
American
Soldier
Marcus Luttrell Quotes
American
Soldier
Miyamoto Musashi Quotes
Japanese
Soldier
Oliver North Quotes
American
Soldier
Philip Sidney Quotes
English
Soldier
R. Lee Ermey Quotes
American
Soldier
Robert Baden-Powell Quotes
English
Soldier
T. E. Lawrence Quotes
British
Soldier
Wilfred Owen Quotes
English
Soldier
William Tecumseh Sherman Quotes
American
Soldier
Yamamoto Tsunetomo Quotes
Japanese
Soldier