A Quote by Dave Hickey

I don't think the government should touch art. Governments are risk averse. They encourage risk-averse personalities to be artists. — © Dave Hickey
I don't think the government should touch art. Governments are risk averse. They encourage risk-averse personalities to be artists.
If you think in terms of major losses, because losses loom much larger than gains - that's a very well-established finding - you tend to be very risk-averse. When you think in terms of wealth, you tend to be much less risk-averse.
Increase your company's average talent with each hire - founders tend to be pretty smart but willing to take on risk. Employees should be a lot smarter and less risk averse.
I think there's a danger in politics of being too risk-averse.
The music business is suffering because fewer artists are being invested in. Labels are putting in less money, taking fewer risks and signing half as many artists as they did 10 years ago. Everything is risk averse right now and there are two ways to deal with a business situation like this: either reduce your risk or increase your return. They're reducing their risk to the bone and looking for ways with their 360 deals to increase their return. They're still not making money. Artists are suffering. Labels, or music investors, are suffering.
Random distributions are not good things, because people are risk-averse, and this risk adversely affects their welfare. If you get too much price uncertainty, all kinds of long-term, mutually beneficial contracts can't be entered into.
The civil service are risk averse.
People who are over-educated become risk-averse.
There's no question that women are more risk averse, thoughtful, and deliberative.
I know what my strengths and weaknesses are on the pitch. My duty is to be risk averse.
We've become a country that is often risk averse. That's not the way to succeed.
If you are not making any mistakes, you are being excessively risk-averse. Investing involves risk, and that means you will occasionally be wrong. And although it is okay to be wrong, it is not okay to stay wrong.
I'm generally risk averse, and most great entrepreneurs I know are as well.
Publishers are very risk-averse, so they lean towards licenses and sequels. But the fact is that even those are not guaranteed hits. So, if 'playing it safe' does not guarantee hits, they might as well leave it up to the really creative, risk-taking people, because they couldn't do any worse.
Are we going to be risk-averse about health care, education, child well-being, or are we going to set aside those attitudes, which we find in government all too often, and lead?
I've never been averse to a little risk - after all, writing without risk is not really writing at all. Sometimes one has to just let fly with a high concept piece and see where the pieces fall. As it generally turns out, the central story is familiar, but just with different rules of engagement.
Term limits would make Congress bolder, more independent, and less risk-averse.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!