A Quote by David Harewood

'12 Angry Men' has a truly great collection of actors giving fantastic performances. It's an acting masterclass. — © David Harewood
'12 Angry Men' has a truly great collection of actors giving fantastic performances. It's an acting masterclass.
Period films to me are very often alienating to the audience. There's very often a formality. A staunchy quality to them that comes from the misenscene. It also comes from the performances of the actors, because they're acting Victorian which really means that they're just acting the way they've seen previous actors act Victorian.
I already love acting and I love actors, so being able to communicate with actors and to bring performances out of them, and to tell a story and aid them, is really exciting for me.
I was dancing when I was acting as well. Actors generally dance in performances like in an award function.
I don't come to work as an actor. There are many directors who can direct without ever having acted and do a great job and connect with their actors and lead them to excellent performances without themselves having had an acting background.
The great difference between screen acting and theatre acting is that screen acting is about reacting - 75% of the time, great screen actors are great reactors.
I love talking about acting. I'm just such a fan of actors and filmmakers, and I try to choose roles where I get to talk to great actors about acting and learn.
Acting can truly take a toll on your nerves. I mean we have to be larger than life. Worse, I've seen actors acting off the sets too.
Acting can truly take a toll on your nerves. I mean, we have to be larger than life. Worse, I've seen actors acting off the sets, too.
I didn't even know what acting was at 11 years old. I truly believed that acting was hidden cameras everywhere. And I felt that these actors on the screen were somehow real people.
I do feel that scripts get developed now to a point where they're sort of actor-proof. If the actor is not very good, the narrative still survives because it's all in the dialogue. Not to say there aren't great performances in English-language films, because there are every year, but the 1970s were awash with great performances, and I was wondering whether it had to do with the amount of space and the amount of responsibility given to the actors.
I've always appreciated great acting performances, but I've even learned to appreciate not so great ones 'cause it's hard.
I can see it in even great actors' performances, when they're phoning it in.
I watched '12 Angry Men' when I was a kid. It blew me away definitely.
In film, other actors' performances really are not your concern. If the other actor isn't giving you what you want, act as though he were.
Acting, for me, is giving to your co-actors.
If I'm going to be honest about it, I think men get to do this sort of thing all the time. You look at countless performances by great male actors who get to play the whole gamut of human emotions. Women aren't regularly allowed to do that, and I don't know why people are so frightened by it.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!