A Quote by Emily Thornberry

The Fraud Act 2006 makes it perfectly clear that Libor rigging is prosecutable as a criminal offence. — © Emily Thornberry
The Fraud Act 2006 makes it perfectly clear that Libor rigging is prosecutable as a criminal offence.
There are some very plain, very simple offences in the Fraud Act 2006 that can be applied to price manipulation. For example, there's fraud by false representation. This is aimed at people who say something misleading to line their pockets or cause financial harm to someone else.
In passing the National Minimum Wage Act in 1998, the then-Labour Government did more than just establish the legal right to a minimum wage, significant as that was. More importantly, the Act made non-compliance a criminal offence.
In existing criminology there are concepts: a criminal man, a criminal profession, a criminal society, a criminal sect, and a criminal tribe, but there is no concept of a criminal state, or a criminal government, or criminal legislation. Consequently what is often regarded as "political" activity is in fact a criminal activity.
The statements of atheists ought to be perfectly clear of doubt. Now it is not perfectly clear that the soul is material.
To make things 'perfectly clear' is reactionary and stupefying. The real is not perfectly clear.
The thing about rigging is, you can learn it if you become a master rigger but there's no book on rigging.
An O'Toole government will pass a Freedom of Movement Act that will make it a criminal offence to block a railway, airport, port, or major road, or to block the entrance to a business or household in a way that prevents people from lawfully entering or leaving.
There has never been a prosecuted case of slavery. There's no criminality to it. So, it was just like, 'It's over,' and thus, because it was over, and it was never considered 'wrong' in the prosecutable, criminal sense of the word, the country doesn't take it as wrong.
The crime of bribery of foreign officials is an offence under the Commonwealth Criminal Code.
9/11 was not an act of war. It was a criminal act. It was a simple. Criminal act by a bunch of lunatic fanatic violent people who needed to be tracked down and apprehended and tried exactly as you would with any other lunatic violent person, like we do with our own domestic terrorists, like the guy who bombed the Oklahoma federal building.
In the 1950s, buggery was a criminal offence. Now it's a requirement to receive benefits from the federal government.
Under the Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006, it is an offence to stir up hatred towards religious and racial groups. 'Stirring up hatred' is an expression both loaded and undefined. Do I stir up hatred towards a religious group by criticising its beliefs in outspoken terms?
The federal government began investigating allegations of fraud against the Coalition Provisional Authority, a U.S. contractor accused in a bid-rigging operation involving millions of dollars. Asked to comment, a spokesperson for Halliburton said, 'Millions? With an M? That is adorable.'
You don't have to be a criminal to write about fraud!
On November 7, 2006, Cafferty called Donald Rumsfeld "an obnoxious jerk and war criminal".
In the awakened state, the mind is either perfectly silent or it is a perfectly clear instrument of expression.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!