A Quote by Frederick Lenz

Selfless giving is the art of living. — © Frederick Lenz
Selfless giving is the art of living.
Selfless giving does not imply superiority. Selfless giving is about love.
To be a teacher you have to have a very giving, selfless personality. I don't think I'm that selfless and giving.
In the eyes of many people, giving doesn't count unless it's completely selfless. In reality, though, giving isn't sustainable when it's completely selfless.
Selfless-giving burns away the layers of the onion. Purity and humility keep meditation and selfless-giving clear. Love radiates through the entire practice because we do all of it only for love.
I profoundly feel that the art of living is the art of giving. You're fulfilled in the moment of giving, of doing something beyond yourself.
Selfless giving is measured by how good you feel. Self giving should be obvious.
Selfless giving does not imply giving everything up - it's simply having a good time.
When no one is selfless in a relationship, there is war. When one is selfless, there is peace. When both are selfless, there is joy.
When you practice selfless giving, you're in balance and harmony with everything.
Selfless giving presupposes something - that there is a lumunious reality.
Love is selfless, it is a weakness, a giving in, a constant falling.
Love is selfless. The key is giving up yourself.
Selfless giving is being nice and there are times we don't want to be.
There's little in taking or giving, There's little in water or wine: This living, this living, this living, Was never a project of mine. Oh, hard is the struggle, and sparse is The gain of the one at the top, For art is a form of catharsis, And love is a permanent flop, And work is the province of cattle, And rest's for a clam in a shell, So I'm thinking of throwing the battle - Would you kindly direct me to hell?
The whole art of living consists in giving up existence in order to exist.
I love art, and I love history, but it is living art and living history that I love. It is in the interest of living art and living history that I oppose so-called restoration. What history can there be in a building bedaubed with ornament, which cannot at the best be anything but a hopeless and lifeless imitation of the hope and vigor of the earlier world?
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!