A Quote by G. H. Hardy

A mathematician, like a painter or a poet, is a maker of patterns. — © G. H. Hardy
A mathematician, like a painter or a poet, is a maker of patterns.
A mathematician, like a painter or poet, is a maker of patterns. If his patterns are more permanent than theirs, it is because they are made with ideas.
A mathematician, like a painter or a poet, is a maker of patterns. If his patterns are more permanent than theirs, it is because they are made with ideas.
The mathematician's patterns, like the painter's or the poet's, must be beautiful.
The mathematician's patterns, like the painter's or the poet's must be beautiful; the ideas, like the colours or the words must fit together in a harmonious way. Beauty is the first test: there is no permanent place in the world for ugly mathematics.
No form of art repeats or imitates successfully all that can be said by another; the writer conveys his experience of life along a channel of communication closed to painter, mathematician, musician, film-maker.
As a poet and as a mathematician, he would reason well; as a mere mathematician, he could not have reasoned at all.
A mathematician who is not also something of a poet will never be a complete mathematician.
Although the poet has as wide a choice of subjects as the painter, his creations fail to afford as much satisfaction to mankind as do paintings... if the poet serves the understanding by way of the ear, the painter does so by the eye, which is the nobler sense.
There are only patterns. Patterns on top of patterns, patterns that affect other patterns, patterns hidden by patterns, patterns within patterns.
There are only patterns, patterns on top of patterns, patterns that affect other patterns. Patterns hidden by patterns. Patterns within patterns. If you watch close, history does nothing but repeat itself. What we call chaos is just patterns we haven't recognized. What we call random is just patterns we can't decipher. what we can't understand we call nonsense. What we can't read we call gibberish. There is no free will. There are no variables.
Both poet and painter want to reach the silence behind the language, the silence within the language. Both painter and poet want their work to shine not only in daylight but (by whatever illusionist magic) from within.
I think a poet, like a painter, should be a craftsperson.
I didn't read poetry seriously until college, when I really began to devour it in a very intense way. I also discovered that a poet is a maker. Before that, I thought a poet was someone who wrote about his own experiences.
Like the musician, the painter, the poet and the rest, the true lover of flowers is born, not made.
My dad is a mathematician; I think we both have that problem-solving, looking-for-patterns way of thinking.
It is impossible to be a mathematician without being a poet in soul.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!