A Quote by Gad Saad

Trigger warnings are an instantiation of the West's zeitgeist of perpetual offense and victimhood that defines much of public discourse. — © Gad Saad
Trigger warnings are an instantiation of the West's zeitgeist of perpetual offense and victimhood that defines much of public discourse.
Trigger warnings are part of the West's debauchery of self-indulgent victimhood.
The bunker business is just one instantiation, the grandest instantiation, of what you might think of as conspiracy capitalism.
During a large disaster, like Hurricane Katrina, warnings get hopelessly jumbled. The truth is that, for warnings to work, it's not enough for them to be delivered. They must also overcome that human tendency to pause; they must trigger a series of effective actions, mobilizing the informal networks that we depend on in a crisis.
The discourse of the West and the attitudes of its leaders are important because they influence public debate in Turkey.
As the West Coast offense has spread out among the NFL, as all of Bill Walsh's assistants and all of Mike Holmgren's assistants have gone on to be head coaches, it's all the West Coast offense, but it's all a little different, tailored to the personnel or the coordinators or the resources each team has.
Trigger warnings and safe spaces are an infantilizing setback for feminism - and for women.
To counter the fixation on a rhetoric of victimhood, black folks must engage in a discourse of self-determination.
At least in the West, politicians, corporations and media moguls can no longer take for granted their power to control the public discourse - and have it go unchallenged.
Architecture is a discourse; everything is a discourse. Fashion discourse is actually a micro-discourse, because it's centered around the body. It is the most rapidly developing form of discourse.
The public discourse on global warming has little in common with the standards of scientific discourse. Rather, it is part of political discourse where comments are made to secure the political base and frighten the opposition rather than to illuminate issues. In political discourse, information is to be 'spun' to reinforce pre-existing beliefs, and to discourage opposition.
Do I think that, when we're teaching a book at school, should we go through a myriad list of trigger warnings? No. But I understand why people desire it.
It is just as much an offense to take offense as it is to give offense.
Prohibiting any words not approved of as 'politically correct' - that's not progressive. Putting 'trigger warnings' on books, movies, music, anything that might offend people - that's not progressive, either.
You add to the suffering in the world when you take offense, just as much as you do when you give offense.
Tragically, we live in a day when offense to God doesn't matter nearly as much as offense to others.
As with much of the world's problems, they become public--or much more of interest--the moment they begin to impact the West.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!