A Quote by George Bernard Shaw

I claim to be a conscientiously immoral writer. — © George Bernard Shaw
I claim to be a conscientiously immoral writer.
[General Curtis] LeMay recognized that what he was doing would be thought immoral if his side has lost. But what makes it immoral if you lose and not immoral if you win?
We burned to death 100,000 Japanese civilians in Tokyo - men, women and children. LeMay recognized that what he was doing would be thought immoral if his side had lost. But what makes it immoral if you lose and not immoral if you win?
I believe that homosexual acts between individuals are immoral and that we should not condone immoral acts. I do not believe that the Armed Forces of the United States are well served by a saying through our policies that it's OK to be immoral in any way.
I believe that homosexual acts between individuals are immoral and that we should not condone immoral acts... I do not believe that the Armed Forces of the United States are well served by saying through our policies that it's OK to be immoral in any way, not just with regards to homosexuality.
The fact that a man has no claim on others ... does not preclude or prohibit good will among men and does not make it immoral to offer or to accept voluntary, non-sacrificial assistance.
I don't think any songwriter who comes up through playing clubs can really claim to have independently developed their art. All along the way so much information is coming, the writer inside the performer unconsciously reacts to all of that. By the time they get to be thirty, the writer is gone.
A morality clause is a grey area that the powers that be say if it is immoral, than it's immoral, and you are getting fired.
Proselytizing is only wrong if coercive or deceptive. Coercion, whether violent or not, is immoral, just as deception is immoral.
Asking someone else to do something immoral is immoral.
What makes it immoral if you lose and not immoral if you win?
The claim that everybody sees the world differently is not a claim that there's no reality. It's a different kind of claim.
No activity that society thinks immoral is victimless. Knowledge that an activity is taking place is a harm to those who find it profoundly immoral.
The final act of an unraveling society isn't immoral behavior; it's canonizing immoral behavior as a 'new normal' and celebrating it as a 'moral victory.'
Nuclear weapons are intrinsically neither moral nor immoral, though they are more prone to immoral use than most weapons.
What is immoral for an individual to do, is immoral for a government to do
I always claim that the writer has done 90 percent of the director's work.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!