A Quote by Gilbert K. Chesterton

Bigotry is an incapacity to conceive seriously the alternative to a proposition. — © Gilbert K. Chesterton
Bigotry is an incapacity to conceive seriously the alternative to a proposition.
A true proposition is a proposition belief which would never lead to such disappointment so long as the proposition is not understood otherwise than it was intended.
Every profound dissatisfaction is of a religious nature: our failures derive from our incapacity to conceive of paradise and to aspire to it, as our discomforts from the fragility of our relations with the absolute.
Your political system is actually too democratic. The fact that Americans vote on every bill and proposition can prolong bigotry indefinitely, especially where it is aimed at minority groups.
The very fact that we find it hard to conceive of an alternative to limitless economic growth is an indication of our spiritual condition.
We can conceive of eternity because we cannot conceive of a cessation of time. We can conceive of infinite space because we cannot conceive of so much matter that our imagination will not stand upon the farthest star and see infinite space beyond.
When an idea, a proposition, a cause is presented to me in terms that leave me no alternative but to be for it, because it's all pros and no cons, then I know I'm being conned.
I feel like I've had bad nights or destructive nights or nights where I don't remember anything or nights where I was seriously injured or seriously in danger. And I remained nihilistic and unconcerned because it felt like there was no alternative.
It is always noteworthy that all those who seriously study this science [the theory of numbers] conceive a sort of passion for it.
There is a bigotry rampant in America, against evangelicals. It is the last respectable bigotry.
There's one form of bigotry that is still acceptable in America - that's the bigotry against the successful.
It is not bigotry to be certain we are right; but it is bigotry to be unable to imagine how we might possibly have gone wrong.
I said I reject any form of bigotry, bigotry of all kinds.
The bigotry of the nonbeliever is for me nearly as funny as the bigotry of the believer.
To make our position clearer, we may formulate it in another way. Let us call a proposition which records an actual or possible observation an experiential proposition. Then we may say that it is the mark of a genuine factual proposition, not that it should be equivalent to an experiential proposition, or any finite number of experiential propositions, but simply that some experiential propositions can be deduced from it in conjunction with certain other premises without being deducible from those other premises alone.
It is nonsense for the Government to allow any loopholes for religious homophobia. Bigotry is bigotry whether it's dressed up in the language of faith or not.
It is more important that a proposition be interesting than that it be true. This statement is almost a tautology. For the energy of operation of a proposition in an occasion of experience is its interest and is its importance. But of course a true proposition is more apt to be interesting than a false one.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!