I used to play as a striker in Holland. I grew up as a striker. That's the position I want to play.
Niang is very good in front of the goal, and he's also a quick learner. He is a versatile striker who can play both as a centre forward and as a second striker.
I still believe I can be a striker but, if you want to be a striker, you have to think more about yourself and that's why you are a striker.
You need two or three players who can do that - play behind the striker, on the right wing, the left wing... striker, maybe. If we have those, it's good for the team.
I like to play. It doesn't matter if it's just me up front on my own or alongside another striker. I always want to play in the first XI.
When you are a striker like me, you always play for the teammates.
I can play as a striker or I can play as a No 10. I can even play on the wing as well.
I want to play football, and I want to help the team. It doesn't matter if I play midfield, if I play in defence, if I play as a striker.
Any striker like me that likes to run in behind, they could play with Thierry.
My second year in Rome was very good. Back then, a striker was a striker. Strikers scored goals; they didn't defend. Today this is normal, but it wasn't at that time. If you wanted to play my style of football you couldn't have old players or famous players who were unwilling to do the job both ways: attacking and also defending.
OK - we like to say how a striker creates space and influences matches in other ways, but let's not pretend: at the end of the season, the best striker everyone talks about is the top scorer.
I like the atmosphere in the Premier League. The teams play attacking football, and for a striker, that is even more attractive.
My preference would be to play as a right winger, but I can also play as a striker.
It's different to play midfielder and striker or No. 10, but I enjoy all the positions I can play.
I'm confident in my own ability, and if I'm called upon to play on the right, the left, or as the main striker, then I can play there.