A Quote by Henry Hazlitt

There is no more certain way to deter employment than to harass and penalize employers. — © Henry Hazlitt
There is no more certain way to deter employment than to harass and penalize employers.
We need to roll back precarious employment models. Temporary and limited contracts were initially seen as a way of introducing more flexibility so as to bridge periods of need in certain phases of production. Some employers have taken advantage of the model to push down wages. In general, we must strive for equal pay for equal work.
We tend to think that employment is employment, and we don't ask the question: is this rewarding employment? Research establishes pretty clearly that typical notions of happiness - that more is better - really don't correspond to the way people think and feel.
If we can deter the Soviet Union, if we can deter North Korea, why on earth can't we deter Iran?
Starting at age 10, my personality and my identity all stemmed from employment. I had a set to be at. I was a certain way with the cameraman, a certain way with the makeup lady - a normal, routine environment.
In addition to higher pay, federal government employment is far more secure than private-sector employment.
You can't have employment and despise employers ... No goose, no golden eggs.
A lot of the bunkering is designed more to save you than it is to penalize you.
Employers, like most people, tend to trust their intuitions. But when employers decide whom to hire, they trust those intuitions far more than they should.
Books leave gestures in the body; a certain way of moving, of turning, a certain closing of the eyes, a way of leaving, hesitations. Books leave certain sounds, a certain pacing; mostly they leave the elusive, which is all the story. They leave much more than the words.
People are more violently opposed to fur than leather because it's safer to harass rich women than motorcycle gangs.
Some entrepreneurs have a bad habit of taking personal credit for all improvements and innovations at their startups. If you penalize or ignore employee initiatives, you can be certain that they won't be repeated, and motivation for more conventional performance will suffer.
The purpose of [a lawsuit] is to harass and discourage rather than to win. The law can be used very easily to harass, and enough harassment on somebody who is simply on the thin edge anyway, well knowing that he is not authorized, will generally be sufficient to cause his professional decease. If possible, of course, ruin him utterly.
Food served is always more than just food served. That is to say, it is more than just fuel for the body. Depending upon who has prepared the food and who has served it and with what spirit, it can uplift the - and around the world, in every culture, food is used to flirt, to be coy, a raise in the employment or to search for employment. It can bring warring factions together.
Most employers see breaks in employment as a blemish on a resume. In the case of military spouses, however, it's due to their frequent moves.
Perhaps even more than constituted authority, it is social uniformity and sameness that harass the individual most.
When you raise the price of employment, guess what happens? You get less of it. Why do we want to make it harder for small employers to hire people?
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!