Freedom of expression is no longer a political nicety, but a precondition for economic competitiveness.
Nothing puts the dignity in personal dignity (or the freedom in personal freedom) like the self in self-rule.
It is necessary to ensure that the requirement to combat terrorism is not used to clamp down on freedom of expression, legitimate dissent, freedom of association and so on.
Here [in the USA], you have the best laws for freedom of expression. The problem is that expression can be bought by people who don't want you have it. Apparently, true patriotism destroys freedom of expression.
I believe in the freedom of expression, unequivocally - though, as I have written before, I wish more people would understand that freedom of expression is not freedom from consequence.
A person without self-expression is a person without personal freedom.
Limitation of means is a precondition of excellence. Creative freedom chooses its limitations. Destructive freedom rejects them heedlessly.
The search for total knowledge starts from the Self and finds its fulfillment in coming back to the Self, finding that everything is the expression of the Self - everything is the expression of my own Self.
We talk about self-expression but need to pause and remember that self-expression requires a self to express.
Sound public finances are not the enemy of sustained growth - they are its precondition.
Style, to me, is an extension of one's personality, a kind of self expression which is very personal. It is an expression of your moods, your personality.
The education of peoples is a necessary precondition to peace.
What do we want for people? Human dignity, personal expression and fulfillment, justice, freedom.
Creative freedom and self-expression is what MySpace is all about.
The precondition to freedom is security.
Culture, as Indian people understood it, was basically a lifestyle by which a people acted. It was self-expression, but not a conscious self-expression. Rather, it was an expression of the essence of a
people.