A Quote by Jean Baudrillard

We are no longer dealing with historical events, but with places of collapse. — © Jean Baudrillard
We are no longer dealing with historical events, but with places of collapse.
This is an important point about symbols: they do not refer to historical events; they refer through historical events to spiritual or psychological principles and powers that are of yesterday, today, and tomorrow, and that are everywhere.
Historical investigation has for its aim to fix the order and character of events throughout past time and in all places. The task is frankly superhuman.
When the venture has been made of dealing with historical events and characters, it always seems fair towards the reader to avow what liberties have been taken, and how much of the sketch is founded on history.
History is opaque. You see what comes out, not the script that produces events, [...] The generator of historical events is different from the events themselves, much as the minds of the gods cannot be read just by witnessing their deeds.
There are dozens of writings outside of the Bible that verify the historical accuracy of many of the names of people, places, and events mentioned in the Bible. In fact, external sources verify that at least eighty persons mentioned in the Bible were actual historical figures. Fifty people from the Old Testament, and thirty people from the New Testament.
Historical fiction is not history. You're blending real events and actual historical personages with characters of your own creation.
We have gotten away from this double aspect of either putting the character back into historical events or of making a historical event of his very life.
I believe that historians and analysts of historical events need the authority of facts supplied by living witnesses to the events, which they make their subject.
When writing about historical characters I try to be as accurate as possible, and in particular not to misrepresent the view they held. With a real historical figure you have to be fair, and this is not an obligation you have in dealing with your own creations, so it is quite different.
Regimes collapse when people are no longer afraid and think they're no longer alone.
A United States collapse would be much different than a Greece collapse. Greece can collapse, and there's a ripple. We collapse, and the world feels it.
It no longer matters who consider themselves the masters of events. Events no longer obey their masters.
If you're writing something that's clearly labelled as an alternative history, of course it's perfectly legitimate to play with known historical characters and events, but less so when you're writing an essentially straight historical fiction.
I've been typed as historical fiction, historical women's fiction, historical mystery, historical chick lit, historical romance - all for the same book.
The minute you're working with the government, you're dealing with bureaucracy, you're dealing with time lags, you're dealing with rigidity, you're dealing with a slow pace.
For the most part you are dealing with jealousy, you are dealing with love, you're dealing with hatred, you are dealing with revenge and all of these sort of classic things.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!