A Quote by Jeff Mills
I support copyright. I mean it is intellectual property, it is the thought process of someone and those things should always be protected.
Quote Topics
Quote Author
Related Quotes
In the epic war over Silicon Valley's intellectual property, Bill Gates was on the side of licensing copyright and robust protections for intellectual property. He wasn't on the side of the hackers, and he didn't want information to be free.
All artists are protected by copyright... and we should be the first to respect copyright.
There are people out there who don't see value in intellectual property, and so they're always going to have a problem if there are lawsuits involving intellectual property.
We as a music community have our own issues about advocacy, copyright, intellectual property, being paid fairly for the work that we do.
I think intellectual property is more like land, and copyright violation is more like trespass. Even though you don't take anything away from the landowner when you trespass, most people understand and respect the laws that make it illegal. The real crime in copyright violation is not the making of the copies, it's the expropriation of the creator's right to control the creation.
I am a strong believer that intellectual property rights need to be protected.
One ideological claim is that private property is theft, that the natural product of the existence of property is evil, and that private ownership therefore should not exist... What those who feel this way don't realize is that property is a notion that has to do with control - that property is a system for the disposal of power. The absence of property almost always means the concentration of power in the state.
Anyone who knows anything should know you cannot take a master track of a recording and write another song over the top of it. You just can't do that. You can call it a tribute or whatever you want to call it, but it's against the law. That's a problem with some of the younger generation, they don't understand the concept of intellectual property and copyright.
Under the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act, Tumblr, YouTube, Reddit, WordPress, and Facebook aren't responsible for the copyright infringement of each of their millions of users, so long as they take down specific posts, videos, or images when notified by copyright holders. But copyright holders thought that wasn't good enough.
We must speak first about the division of land and about those who cultivate it: who should they be and what kind of person? We do not agree with those who have said that property should be communally owned, but we do believe that there should be a friendly arrangement for its common use, and that none of the citizens should be without means of support.
The most important thing about intellectual property vs. creative expression is that copyright law was created not to stifle creativity but to encourage creativity.
The alternative to intellectual property is straightforward: intellectual products should not be owned, as in the case of everyday language. That means not owned by individuals, corporations, governments, or the community as common property. It means that ideas are available to be used by anyone who wants to.
This does not mean that every copyright must prove its value initially. That would be a far too cumbersome system of control. But it does mean that every system or category of copyright or patent should prove its worth.
Non-commercial file sharing should of course become legal and protected, and must re-think copyright all together.
The types of ideas protected by intellectual-property law typically don't include a clever catchphrase on a Vine or a film idea in a tweet.
Monopolies are not justified by theory; they should be permitted only when justified by facts. If there is no solid basis for extending a certain monopoly protection, then we should not extend that protection. This does not mean that every copyright must prove its value initially. That would be a far too cumbersome system of control. But it does mean that every system or category of copyright or patent should prove its worth. Before the monopoly should be permitted, there must be reason to believe it will do some good -- for society, and not just for monopoly holders.
Related Authors
A-Trak Quotes
Canadian
DJ
Damien Fahey Quotes
American
DJ
Erol Alkan Quotes
Cypriot
DJ
Fatboy Slim Quotes
English
DJ
Frankie Knuckles Quotes
American
DJ
Jazzie B Quotes
British
DJ
Jimmy Savile Quotes
English
DJ
John Digweed Quotes
British
DJ
Joseph Simmons Quotes
American
DJ
Martyn Quotes
Dutch
DJ
Nicky Romero Quotes
Dutch
DJ
Oliver $ Quotes
German
DJ
Paul van Dyk Quotes
German
DJ
Pedro Winter Quotes
French
DJ
Ryan Hemsworth Quotes
Canadian
DJ
Tony Blackburn Quotes
English
DJ