A Quote by Jeff Zucker

It's a growing trend. Viewers are our customers, but so are advertisers. And advertisers want different ways to reach our viewers. — © Jeff Zucker
It's a growing trend. Viewers are our customers, but so are advertisers. And advertisers want different ways to reach our viewers.
We're committed to delivering our viewers and advertisers year-round programming with a wide variety of storytelling.
It is obvious that the Internet has become such a video-driven entity. With broadband becoming ubiquitous, viewers and advertisers are looking for professional-quality videos.
Advertisers like shows that viewers like to watch live.
On the monetization front, our strengthening leadership in internet user base and broadening reach of our platform have already positioned us as a must-buy platform in online video for brand advertisers to reach a nationwide audience within China.
Networks decide who will have a chance to do shows, but it is the viewers who make the final decision of who stays and who goes. I am very fortunate, in that the television viewers of our country have decided that Bob Barker can stay.
Whether through TV, film, online, app, or web, we will find ways to tell our stories with authenticity, and engage with our viewers beyond traditional means.
Everything is happening faster on the Internet, so advertisers have to be able to respond quickly. If there is a pop-culture topic, a celebrity, event, some amazing viral video, a news story - how do advertisers get close to that so they can take advantage of traffic jumps?
Broadening and deepening the relationship with our users and advertisers have always been our strategic priority.
YouTube is growing up, is basically my view of it. Growing up means our creators are growing up; they're getting more well known. We're providing programs for them to generate more revenue so they can generate even better, high-quality shows, and then also connecting them with the advertisers.
Network television has been attempting to lure viewers for years with its low-interest programming only to have those viewers discover later that their brains are bankrupt.
When we are part of mainstream cinema, we want our movies to be seen by maximum viewers.
It's against all of our policies for an application to ever share information with advertisers.
Congress seems to believe that 'Children are our future' is a phrase coined by tobacco advertisers.
I enjoy things that are relevant to me, like maths and science and 'Countdown,' and I don't want to offend our viewers.
I believe our editorial decisions reflected our constant desire to make sure that we fully cover and analyze any issue and give our viewers all the information they need.
The New York Times and PBS are gatekeepers of a sort. And they perform that role of gatekeeping with a set of rules and aspirations about where they want to lead their viewers and their readers. They value objective facts, and they attempt to transmit a comprehensive view of the world. And they do have values. And they do lead their viewers and their readers to certain conclusions. But it's different than such monopolies as Apple or Google which are dissecting information into these bits and pieces, which they're then transmitting to people. And it's about clicks.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!