A Quote by Joao Magueijo
It is sometimes said that we should never believe a scientific theory until it is verified by experiment. But a famous astronomer has also stated that we should never believe an observation until it is confirmed by a theory.
Quote Topics
Quote Author
Related Quotes
Observation and theory get on best when they are mixed together, both helping one another in the pursuit of truth. It is a good rule not to put overmuch confidence in a theory until it has been confirmed by observation. I hope I shall not shock the experimental physicists too much if I add that it is also a good rule not to put overmuch confidence in the observational results that are put forward until they have been confirmed by theory.
I don't believe any experiment until it is confirmed by theory. I find this is a witty inversion of "conventional" wisdom.
Don't believe the results of experiments until they're confirmed by theory.
Never accept a fact until it has been verified by theory.
Well, it [evolution] is a theory, it is a scientific theory only, and it has in recent years been challenged in the world of science and is not yet believed in the scientific community to be as infallible as it once was believed. But if it was going to be taught in the schools, then I think that also the biblical theory of creation, which is not a theory but the biblical story of creation, should also be taught.
If you're a physicist, for heaven's sake, and here is the experiment, and you have a theory, and the theory doesn't agree with the experiment, then you have to cut out the theory. You were wrong with the theory.
The scientific theorist is not to be envied. For Nature, or more precisely experiment, is an exorable and not very friendly judge of his work. It never says "yes" to a theory. In the most favorable cases it says "Maybe," and in the great majority of cases simply "No." If an experiment agrees with a theory it means for the latter "Maybe," and if it does not agree it means "No." Probably every theory will some day experience its "No" - most theories, soon after conception.
I don't believe anything till I have seen the proof. For anything without proof, I think we should believe the theory that gives us peace. It doesn't matter whether the theory is true or not.
If you can't think of an observation that could disprove a theory, that theory simply isn't scientific.
It is easy to obtain confirmations, or verifications, for nearly every theory-if we look for confirmations. Confirmations should count only if they are the result of risky predictions... A theory which is not refutable by any conceivable event is non-scientific. Irrefutability is not a virtue of a theory (as people often think) but a vice. Every genuine test of a theory is an attempt to falsify it, or refute it.
Einstein didn't speak until he was four, leading most of his teachers to believe he was crazy. That is until he whipped out the theory of relativity. BAYUM! Showed you guys.
[Theory is] an explanation that has been confirmed to such a degree, by observation and experiment, that knowledgeable experts accept it as fact. That's what scientists mean when they talk about a theory: not a dreamy and unreliable speculation, but an explanatory statement that fits the evidence. They embrace such an explanation confidently but provisionally - taking it as their best available view of reality, at least unil some severely conflicting data or some better explanation might come along.
Theory said one thing and the experiment said something different, so that was the stimulus that started me going, that there was something there to be explained, which wasn't understood and to try to see why that experiment gave the answer it did, so it was a big opportunity for a young student starting to have actually an experiment which contradicted the theory, so that's was my chance to understand that.
It is also a good rule not to put overmuch confidence in the observational results that are put forward until they are confirmed by theory.
My opinion about Miller's experiments is the following. ... Should the positive result be confirmed, then the special theory of relativity and with it the general theory of relativity, in its current form, would be invalid. Experimentum summus judex. Only the equivalence of inertia and gravitation would remain, however, they would have to lead to a significantly different theory.
There is no such thing as absolute truth and absolute falsehood. The scientific mind should never recognise the perfect truth or the perfect falsehood of any supposed theory or observation. It should carefully weigh the chances of truth and error and grade each in its proper position along the line joining absolute truth and absolute error.
Related Authors
Andre Villas-Boas Quotes
Portuguese
Businessman
Antonio Damasio Quotes
Portuguese
Scientist
Antonio Guterres Quotes
Portuguese
Politician
Bernardo Silva Quotes
Portuguese
Athlete
Bruno Fernandes Quotes
Portuguese
Footballer
Cristiano Ronaldo Quotes
Portuguese
Footballer
Fernando Pessoa Quotes
Portuguese
Author
Joao Moutinho Quotes
Portuguese
Athlete
Jose Manuel Barroso Quotes
Portuguese
Politician
Jose Mourinho Quotes
Portuguese
Coach
Jose Saramago Quotes
Portuguese
Novelist
Marco Silva Quotes
Portuguese
Athlete
Nani Quotes
Portuguese
Athlete
Nuno Bettencourt Quotes
Portuguese
Musician
Nuno Espirito Santo Quotes
Portuguese
Athlete
Sara Sampaio Quotes
Portuguese
Model