A Quote by John Adams

Those who trade liberty for security have neither. — © John Adams
Those who trade liberty for security have neither.
He who would trade liberty for some temporary security, deserves neither liberty nor security.
Those who give up liberty for the sake of security, deserve neither liberty nor security.
Those who give up their liberty for more security neither deserve liberty nor security.
Benjamin Franklin once said, 'A people who would trade liberty for security deserve neither.' I think we can have both. We can keep our liberties. We can have our security.
Those who prefer security to liberty deserve neither.
Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither.
Those who are willing to forfeit liberty for security will have neither.
Trade liberty for safety or money and you'll end up with neither. Liberty, like a grain of salt, easily dissolves. The power of questioning - not simply believing - has no friends. Yet liberty depends on it.
Such regulations may, no doubt, be considered as in some respect a violation of natural liberty. But those exertions of the natural liberty of a few individuals, which might endanger the security of the whole society, are, and ought to be, restrained by the laws of all governments; of the most free, as well as or the most despotical. The obligation of building party walls, in order to prevent the communication of fire, is a violation of natural liberty, exactly of the same kind with the regulations of the banking trade which are here proposed.
Some in Washington say that you have to trade your liberty for security.
Those who sell their liberty for security are understandable, if pitiable, creatures. Those who sell the liberty of others for wealth, power, or even a moments respite deserve only the end of a rope.
Anyone willing to give up liberty in exchange for security deserves neither.
People willing to trade their freedom for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both.
I would argue that security and liberty, security and privacy are not actually opposing. The only place those can be oppositional is in the realm of rhetoric but not fact.
A people who chose security over liberty will receive neither nor deserve either.
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!