A Quote by John Calvin

I don't need to compromise my principles, because they don't have the slightest bearing on what happens to me anyway. — © John Calvin
I don't need to compromise my principles, because they don't have the slightest bearing on what happens to me anyway.
The morality of compromise' sounds contradictory. Compromise is usually a sign of weakness, or an admission of defeat. Strong men don't compromise, it is said, and principles should never be compromised. I shall argue that strong men, conversely, know when to compromise and that all principles can be compromised to serve a greater principle.
You can compromise without violating your principles, but it is nearly impossible to compromise when you turn principles into ideology.
There can be no compromise on basic principles. There can be no compromise on moral issues. There can be no compromise on matters of knowledge, of truth, of rational conviction.
One of the problems the Republican Party has had is that we're too fast to compromise. You can compromise on the little stuff, but you can't compromise on your core principles.
I would not compromise my principles for politics. You're saying, will it become politically unpopular to have the position I'm having? If it does, so be it. I don't compromise my principles for politics.
The 'morality of compromise' sounds contradictory. Compromise is usually a sign of weakness, or an admission of defeat. Strong men don't compromise, it is said, and principles should never be compromised.
You can't feel the need to be liked in public life, because if you do you will compromise the principles that are so important to the public having confidence in your ethics and integrity.
Liberals don't care. Their approach is to rip out society's foundations without asking if they serve any purpose. Why do we have immigration laws? What's with these borders? Why do we have the institution of marriage, anyway? What do we need standardized tests for? Hey, I like Keith Richards - why not make heroin legal? Let's take a sledgehammer to all these load-bearing walls and just see what happens!
Gingrich, Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole, and Clinton passed legislation because they understood and appreciated the difficult political process. They fought for their principles yet recognized the need for compromise to get anything done.
Compromise for compromise sake is never good, unless it is grounded in principles.
Compromise today is too often applauded simply for itself. The cost of compromise to principles and real lives doesn't seem to matter.
While I am willing to compromise on process or on programs, I will not compromise my principles, nor would I expect those I work with to do so.
They're talking about things of which they don't have the slightest understanding, anyway. It's only because of their stupidity that they're able to be so sure of themselves.
It's not that I'm not willing to compromise. But I won't compromise on principles.
Compromise now, because you'll have to later, anyway, only then you'll have gone through things you'll wish you hadn't.
Compromise, contrary to popular opinion, does not mean selling out one's principles. Compromise means working out differences to forge a solution which fits the diversity of the body politic.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!