A Quote by John Dewey

It is a familiar and significant saying that a problem well put is half-solved. — © John Dewey
It is a familiar and significant saying that a problem well put is half-solved.
a problem well put is half solved.
A problem well stated is a problem half-solved.
We have a saying in Tibet: If a problem can be solved there is no use worrying about it. If it can't be solved, worrying will do no good.
A problem clearly stated is a problem half solved.
A problem defined, is a problem half solved.
Becoming carbon neutral is only the beginning. The climate problem will not be solved by one company reducing its emissions to zero, and it won't be solved by one government acting alone. The climate problem will not be solved without mass participation by the general public in countries around the globe.
A problem adequately stated is a problem solved theoretically and immediately, and therefore subsequently to be solved, realistically.
A problem is often half-solved when it is clearly stated.
If the problem can be solved why worry? If the problem cannot be solved worrying will do you no good.
A problem adequately stated is a problem well on its way to being solved.
When you have solved the problem of controlling the attention of the child, you have solved the entire problem of its education.
I believe acknowledging our own mistakes is half the problem solved.
I am a good man and I behave well on an everyday basis. It was not a decision of waking up one day and saying "I will be a good person today, problem solved", no, it has to be an everyday thing.
There's a tremendous popular fallacy which holds that significant research can be carried out by trying things. Actually it is easy to show that in general no significant problem can be solved empirically, except for accidents so rare as to be statistically unimportant. One of my jests is to say that we work empirically -- we use bull's eye empiricism. We try everything, but we try the right thing first!
We had global warming between 1940 and 1998. Since then, we haven't had a rise in temperature. That doesn't mean we don't have a problem. If that problem is going to be solved, it ought to be solved by an international treaty.
Am I right in saying that the locust of this problem is simply that judges in America are half political animals and half oracular demigods?
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!