A Quote by John Green

I'm really not up for answering any questions that start with how, when, where, why or what. — © John Green
I'm really not up for answering any questions that start with how, when, where, why or what.
Science is very good at answering the 'how' questions. 'How did the universe evolve to the form that we see?' But it is woefully inadequate in addressing the 'why' questions. 'Why is there a universe at all?' These are the meaning questions, which many people think religion is particularly good at dealing with.
In general, questions are fine; you can always seize upon the parts of them that interest you and concentrate on answering those. And one has to remember when answering questions that asking questions isn't easy either, and for someone who's quite shy to stand up in an audience to speak takes some courage.
I have no problem with answering questions honestly or even looking outside the box and answering private questions.
Art can end up answering questions or asking questions. But when it's not connected to actual movements, it doesn't ask the right questions.
What makes a show good for me, personally, is a mystery that just doesn't quit. I want to know why. Why did this happen? Why is this phenomenon occurring? Why did that person do that? A series is really good to me that takes its time in answering those questions.
I don't mind doing interviews. I don't mind answering thoughtful questions. But I'm not thrilled about answering questions like, 'If you were being mugged, and you had a lightsaber in one pocket and a whip in the other, which would you use?'
Anyone who says the artist's field is all answers and no questions has never done any writing or had any dealings with imageryYou are confusing two concepts: answering the questions and formulating them correctly. Only the latter is required of an author.
The mathematical question is "Why?" It's always why. And the only way we know how to answer such questions is to come up, from scratch, with these narrative arguments that explain it. So what I want to do with this book is open up this world of mathematical reality, the creatures that we build there, the questions that we ask there, the ways in which we poke and prod (known as problems), and how we can possibly craft these elegant reason-poems.
I'm really much better at asking questions than answering them, since asking questions is like a constant deflection of oneself.
I really don't think art is good at answering questions. It's much better at posing questions - and even better at simply asking people to open their eyes.
I know for my family, the only question that we will be answering is how many people are in our home. We won't be answering any information beyond that, because the Constitution doesn't require any information beyond that.
I didn't want to be out of order answering any questions.
I'm good at asking other people questions, but I'm not really good at answering questions.
Most people are really cool and I really don't mind talking to them and answering their questions.
In a way, math isn't the art of answering mathematical questions, it is the art of asking the right questions, the questions that give you insight, the ones that lead you in interesting directions, the ones that connect with lots of other interesting questions -the ones with beautiful answers.
I don't mind answering any questions, because I'm not just a fighter. I'm a lot more than that.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!