A Quote by John Henry Holland

nonlinear interactions almost always make the behavior of the aggregate more complicated than would be predicted by summing or averaging. — © John Henry Holland
nonlinear interactions almost always make the behavior of the aggregate more complicated than would be predicted by summing or averaging.
Since emotions are few and reasons are many (said the robot Giscard) the behavior of a crowd can be more easily predicted than the behavior of one person.
The recycling of resource by the aggregate behavior of a diverse array of agents is much more than the sum of the individual actions.
To accumulate almost 500 games in a decade and a half means I'm averaging more than 30 per season and I'm proud of that.
If we can help to make the interactions between folks online safer and more friendly, that would make it all more fun and more gratifying for everyone.
Probably I have more phobias, fear and eccentricities than I would care to admit. I don't think I'm in danger of losing my mind, but I do often question my own behavior. I have a very bad temper, and it's not always healthy for me and for others. I make my way in the world more difficult, and I could do with a little more yoga.
If you can predict where the market's going, just do what you can predict. If you can't, which is the presumption of dollar cost averaging or time cost averaging, either one, then you're trying to ease in. But if the market rises more than it falls most of the time, easing in is, by definition, a loser's game.
If it takes more than a sentence to explain what you are doing, it's almost always a sign that what you are doing is too complicated.
I wondered if he could ever understand that it was a blessing, not a sin, to be graced with more than one love. It could be complicated; of course it could be complicated. And it opened one up to the possibility of more pain and loss. Still, it was a blessing I would never relinquish. Love, genuine love, was always a cause for joy.
According to a new UN report, the global warming outlook is much worse than originally predicted. Which is pretty bad, when they originally predicted it would destroy the planet.
The case for democracy is that voters in the aggregate will make better decisions than a lone monarch or dictator would.
To manage a system effectively, you might focus on the interactions of the parts rather than their behavior taken separately.
Most languages spoken by a few thousand people are so complicated they make your head swim; a Siberian yak herder's language is much more complicated than a Manhattan bond trader's.
At the end of their first years, there are few people who would have predicted that Truman would be elected in 1948 or that Reagan would get a second term. It's always premature to make some kind of categorical judgment after the first year in office.
You predicted quick victory. Now it’s going to get hopelessly complicated. Jesus, don’t you know any better than that by now?
It is always easier - and usually far more effective - to focus on changing your behavior than on changing the behavior of others.
The business schools reward difficult complex behavior more than simple behavior, but simple behavior is more effective.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!