A Quote by John Morley

In politics the choice is constantly between two evils. — © John Morley
In politics the choice is constantly between two evils.
Politics is the choice between the lesser of two evils.
Politics is a field where the choice lies constantly between two blunders.
The choice before human beings, is not, as a rule, between good and evil but between two evils.
If it feels like you're choosing between the lesser of two evils, don't. There is always a higher choice.
The choice before human beings, is not, as a rule , between good and evil but between two evils. You can let the Nazis rule the world : that is evil; or you can overthrow them by war , which is also evil. There is no other choice before you, and whichever you choose you will not come out with clean hands.
One has got to choose between the two evils, also between the lesser of the two evils in the matter of food, and therefore vegetarian food has got to be taken by man in order to sustain human life.
One has got to choose between the two evils, also between the lesser of the two evils in the matter of food, and therefore vegetarian food has got to he taken by man in order to sustain human life.
The choice in politics isn't usually between black and white. It's between two horrible shades of gray.
I say I'm the only serious comedian in the presidential race. And I'd like to take this opportunity to ask both Romney and Obama to debate me. Because I think that both of those guys - I think that the American people are being given a false choice, because the choice between the lesser of two evils is a false choice.
Pessimist: One who, when he has the choice of two evils, chooses both.
Where there is a choice of two evils, most men take both.
In the real world in which we live, you always have to choose between evils. And in choosing between evils, you have to have moral criteria for how to make those choices.
The choice between two of something is not a choice at all, but rather the opportunity to subscribe to the value system which holds the two presented choices as mutually exclusive alternatives.
The decision must be made between Judaism and Christianity, between business and culture, between male and female, between the race and the individual, between unworhtiness and worth, between the earthly and the higher life, between negation and God-like. Mankind has the choice to make. There are only two poles, and there is no middle way.
Our options oftentimes on foreign policy are not a choice between a good one and a bad one. It's a choice between two less-than-ideal options. And you're trying to figure out which is the least harmful of the two. And I think that's something we should be encouraged by, not something that we should be critical of.
Between two evils, choose neither; between two goods, choose both.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!