A Quote by John Quelch

The FTC doesn't regulate political speech. — © John Quelch
The FTC doesn't regulate political speech.
Experience has shown us that attempts to control the Internet will invariably fail. We should be instructed by the failed efforts of China to regulate political content, the efforts of America to regulate Internet gambling, or the efforts of Australia to regulate certain speech. By its very nature, the Internet will always resist such controls.
Wherever the relevance of speech is at stake, matters become political by definition, for speech is what makes man a political being.
You can't trust politicians. It doesn't matter who makes a political speech. It's all lies - and it applies to any rock star who wants to make a political speech as well.
I believe in freedom of speech. And I believe that spending on political campaigns is a form of political speech that is protected under the constitution.
I'm all in favor of the FTC investigating companies when it believes there is proper cause to do so. An investigation, however, can lead to political pressure to bring a case, even if such a case is unwarranted.
I think over the long run, it's better that government does not regulate the content of speech.
America's founders were clear that the Constitution established a federal government of few and defined powers. It cannot regulate any activity it chooses, but they only regulate in those areas which the Constitution grants it power to regulate.
The solution to voters potentially being misled by a judicial candidate's political speech is more speech - not government censorship.
Political speech is indispensable to decision-making in a democracy, and this is no less true because the speech comes from a corporation rather than an individual.
Because of the free speech clause in the First Amendment, which is very clear, "The government shall make no law abridging freedom of speech," and it literally is about political speech. You can say anything you want about politics, a candidate, and the government cannot stop you. And the Democrats hate that.
It's always easy to get people to condemn threats to free speech when the speech being threatened is speech that they like. It's much more difficult to induce support for free speech rights when the speech being punished is speech they find repellent.
The political core of any movement for freedom in the society has to have the political imperative to protect free speech.
The test of political institutions is the condition of the country whose future they regulate.
There's public health risks to doing large political gatherings, but in this country - and we do still live in America - we protect the right to free speech and we protect the right to political discourse and political events.
You can't regulate child labor. You can't regulate slavery. Some things are just wrong.
I don't think they should regulate the music field. I don't see how they can regulate the arts.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!