A Quote by John Warren Kindt

Gambling is being subsidized by the taxpayers — © John Warren Kindt
Gambling is being subsidized by the taxpayers
While gambling addiction can be a social justice reason for some to ban gambling, the economic evidence suggests that the social and economic costs of gambling are $3 to the taxpayers for every $1 in benefits
Gambling is a bad deal for taxpayers
An aircraft which is used by wealthy people on their expense accounts, whose fares are subsidized by much poorer taxpayers.
Legalized gambling cost taxpayers $3 for every $1 in state revenue to government
The President must stop gambling with taxpayers' money and get the country back on the path of fiscal sanity.
This was my first lesson about gambling: if you see somebody winning all the time, he isn't gambling, he's cheating. Later on in life, if I were continuously losing in any gambling situation, I would watch very closely.
For every dollar of revenue generated by gambling, taxpayers must pay at least $3 in increased criminal justice costs, social welfare expenses, high regulatory costs, and increased infrastructure expenditures
Some taxpayers may object to a print journalism bailout on the grounds that it mostly benefits the liberal elite. And we can't blame taxpayers for being reluctant to subsidize the reportorial careers of J-school twerps who should have joined the Peace Corps and gone to Africa to 'speak truth to power' to Robert Mugabe.
I think when ordinary working people come home, turn on the TV and see a gala of a bunch of people at, you know, a rich gala all subsidized by taxpayers claiming their subsidies aren't high enough, when they know those subsidies have actually gone up - I'm not sure that's something that resonates with ordinary people.
Subsidies create more of whatever is being subsidized.
The only business in the world bigger than gambling is religion...but gambling is not nearly so corrupt.
The next best thing to gambling and winning is gambling and losing.
Colombia was a big wheat producer in the 1950's. That was eliminated by what sounds like a nice plan, called "Food for Peace. " It's a plan by which US taxpayers subsidized US agribusiness to send food to poor countries. This, of course, destroyed the domestic agricultural markets of these countries, opening these markets to US agribusiness.
Gambling addicts usually lose their focus at work and problem military gambling poses a national security threat
I don't see how you have the nerve to oppose this bill when you run the biggest gambling business in the world - gambling on the hereafter.
The thing about online gambling is that it's never away, it's always accessible. And so, if you have an issue with gambling, it's designed to take advantage of that.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!