A Quote by John Yarmuth

Taking responsible steps to reduce poverty is not merely a moral imperative but an economic one. — © John Yarmuth
Taking responsible steps to reduce poverty is not merely a moral imperative but an economic one.
It's a moral imperative, it's an economic imperative, and it is a security imperative. For we've seen how spikes in food prices can plunge millions into poverty, which, in turn, can spark riots that cost lives, and can lead to instability. And this danger will only grow if a surging global population isn't matched by surging food production. So reducing malnutrition and hunger around the world advances international peace and security - and that includes the national security of the United States.
Early childhood education is an urgent educational, economic and moral imperative. Without it, we face a long-term national economic security crisis.
We live in a world community, and economic contact has partly contributed to that. It?s also the case that economic opportunity opened up by economic contact has helped to a great extent to reduce poverty in many parts of the world.
Inflation is taking up the poverty line, and poverty is not just economic but defined by way of health and education.
The phenomenon of economic ignorance is so widespread, and its consequences so frightening, that the objective of reducing that ignorance becomes a goal invested with independent moral worth. But the economic education needed to reduce such ignorance must be based on austere, objective, scientific content—with no ideological or moral content of its own.
I believe that the United States has a moral and economic imperative to mitigate the impacts of climate change.
A tension has always existed between the capitalist imperative to maximize efficiency at any cost and the moral imperatives of culture, which historically have served as a counterweight to the moral blindness of the market. This is another example of the cultural contradictions of capitalism - the tendency over time for the economic impulse to erode the moral underpinnings of society. Mercy toward the animals in our care is one such casualty.
... what we should be looking for is fresh ideas of how we make moral decisions about our dealings with one another, economic, social, cultural. Economic determinism is an objectionable creed where men and women espouse it in its communist or capitalist form because it treats human beings as economic units and not as responsible persons.
One can remain more sure-footed by taking small steps, but perhaps achieve greater speed by taking bigger steps. Of course, one also runs the risk of setting out in a completely erroneous direction. Surely the important thing isn't the length of our steps, but that the objective is clear.
You'll notice that for many progressives, taking from the rich is not simply a necessity of budgeting but a moral imperative and a tool to institute fairness that capitalism supposedly hasn't.
Those of us who were lucky enough to be born in the right countries have a moral obligation to reduce poverty and ill health in the world.
This is what climate action is all about - all sectors of the economy, from places large and small, recognizing the moral imperative and the economic opportunity, stepping up and doing what they can to make a difference.
I'm afraid of taking steps that are not on the map, but by taking those steps despite my fears, I have a much more interesting life.
If you are content with yourself, you'll stop taking those little steps forward and begin taking big steps backward.
We will keep the promise of Social Security by taking the responsible steps to strengthen it - not by turning it over to Wall Street.
But I'm taking small steps 'Cause I don't know where I'm going I'm taking small steps And I don't know what to say. Small steps, Trying to pull myself together And maybe I'll discover A clue along the way!
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!