You need two or three players who can do that - play behind the striker, on the right wing, the left wing... striker, maybe. If we have those, it's good for the team.
I used to play as a striker in Holland. I grew up as a striker. That's the position I want to play.
Niang is very good in front of the goal, and he's also a quick learner. He is a versatile striker who can play both as a centre forward and as a second striker.
I like to play as a striker or secondary striker.
I just want to be playing! I love to play. But I think I can play in the three positions behind the striker.
I still believe I can be a striker but, if you want to be a striker, you have to think more about yourself and that's why you are a striker.
When you're playing against a team that has two great central defenders, the best option is to play without a striker.
I like to play. It doesn't matter if it's just me up front on my own or alongside another striker. I always want to play in the first XI.
I do make a difference. I just come out and provide a presence in the paint, defensively and offensively. I play hard.
You control what you do offensively, defensively. You're controlling who you play, how you want to play.
Obviously when you're a striker you need to score. The manager's not going to just play you if you're not scoring.
You can compare Mesut Ozil to Dennis Bergkamp, because they play just behind the striker.
I can play as a striker or I can play as a No 10. I can even play on the wing as well.
I want to play football, and I want to help the team. It doesn't matter if I play midfield, if I play in defence, if I play as a striker.
My second year in Rome was very good. Back then, a striker was a striker. Strikers scored goals; they didn't defend. Today this is normal, but it wasn't at that time. If you wanted to play my style of football you couldn't have old players or famous players who were unwilling to do the job both ways: attacking and also defending.