A Quote by Karen Thompson Walker

An editor is like a professional reader, and as I became a better reader, I also became a better writer. — © Karen Thompson Walker
An editor is like a professional reader, and as I became a better reader, I also became a better writer.
Working as an editor was like being a professional reader, and the better I became at reading the better I became at writing.
Before you can become a writer, you have to be a reader, and a reader of everything, at that. To the best of my recollection, I became a reader at the age of 10 and have never stopped. Like many authors, I read all sorts of books all the time, and it is amazing how the mind fills up.
I've been writing for as long as I can remember, and reading even before that. My mom still has stories that I wrote when I was in kindergarten. I was a reader and a re-reader. That's the main reason I became a writer.
I was quite a reader before I became a writer.
Once he became a series character, I made the conscious choice that he would never act like a series character, never wink at the reader, never pull his punches. Better for him, better for me.
Because nobody but a reader ever became a writer.
We must be forewarned that only rarely does a text easily lend itself to the reader's curiosity... the reading of a text is a transaction between the reader and the text, which mediates the encounter between the reader and writer. It is a composition between the reader and the writer in which the reader "rewrites" the text making a determined effort not to betray the author's spirit.
I became a reader - never mind a writer - because of Stephen King.
My own disposition is to trust the reader. Of course, there's a line between trusting the reader and expecting her to read your mind. That's where a friend or an editor comes in. A great editor will tell you straight when you've drifted into the latter territory.
I grew up loving books and stories. Reading became my favourite pastime, and you have to be a reader before you can be a writer.
My childhood was spent in my local library in a San Diego suburb. It's where I became a writer - by 1st becoming a reader!
I tend to think that the onus is on the writer to engage the reader, that the reader should not be expected to need the writer, that the writer has to prove it. All that stuff might add up to a kind of fun in the work. I like things that are about interesting subjects, which sounds self-evident.
I'm a writer because I love reading. I love the conversation between a reader and a writer, and that it all takes place in a book-sort of a neutral ground. A writer puts down the words, and a reader interprets the words, and every reader will read a book differently. I love that.
[In the moment of reading writer and reader] are both briefly their best selves, or at least better selves. A flawed human being writes something and 60 years later a reader picks up the book and something in them rises to meet it.
If the writer were more like a reader, he’d be a reader, not a writer. It’s as uncomplicated as that.
I try to be a lot of things for the authors I work with - a careful reader, a helpful friend who also happens to be an experienced writer, a thoughtful editor, and a creative midwife.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!