A top striker like Harry Kane turns half chances into full chances by scoring them.
I wasn't skilful at all... but I'm not saying I was that bad either! I used to take my chances. I was more of a midfielder and therefore a weird striker.
I'm a striker. I feel I can have my greatest impact there because I'm free to roam around the pitch, take players on, have shots and create chances.
I know I have missed some chances, but that's part of being a striker, and I know it's part of being a striker that when you don't score, people talk about it.
You have got to be one step ahead, as a striker, to create that space you need. Apart from the ball, when you're a striker, it is space that's your best friend. You need space.
As a striker, most of the time you have three chances.
I still believe I can be a striker but, if you want to be a striker, you have to think more about yourself and that's why you are a striker.
You need two or three players who can do that - play behind the striker, on the right wing, the left wing... striker, maybe. If we have those, it's good for the team.
When teams play good football, it tends to create chances for the striker.
A striker can miss three or four chances and still score the fifth.
As a striker, you always try to convert your chances, give everything when training.
When you're a striker, you want to play all the games, and most chances come at the end because defenders are tired.
A striker scores goals, but the goalkeepers saves them, the defenders close chances down, and all the credit is shared out.
Ibrahimovic? In my opinion, Ibra is the best striker in Europe. It makes me laugh when people say he misses crucial chances.
I don't believe in taking foolish chances, but nothing can be accomplished if we don't take any chances at all.
Small presses take chances. Chances are at the heart of all the literature we later know as great.