A Quote by Kell Brook

I know I have a mandatory with Errol Spence. He's a very talented fighter but not really heard of in the U.K. or even America, but we all know he can fight. — © Kell Brook
I know I have a mandatory with Errol Spence. He's a very talented fighter but not really heard of in the U.K. or even America, but we all know he can fight.
I mean, Terence Crawford and Errol Spence... that's a great fight. But Keith Thurman vs. Errol Spence and Keith Thurman vs. 'Bud' Crawford, I think those are better fights.
Errol Spence, I really want that fight because everyone says it's too much, too risky. That's exactly why I want to do it. That's a guy who could put me on top as far as best fighter in the world.
Errol Spence is a fighter. He wants to hurt you.
If I could have my dream fight, it would be an Errol Spence rematch.
I saw many people talk about how I would avoid Errol Spence. They don't know me, they don't know what I'm about.
Manny Pacquiao, Errol Spence or anybody who wants to fight me, I'm here. Let's get it on.
If I can't beat DeLuca, how can I say I want to fight the elite of the sport, rematch Errol Spence or fight Terence Crawford? There's no point and I don't have the right to call for world titles. No - I have to win.
I think a fight with Errol Spence is easier to make than Lomachenko because of promotional reasons.
Golovkin and Errol Spence are no dumplings, but even losing to those guys is hard to take.
If Keith Thurman comes back, and he has a great fight and he shows what he's been showing in the fights with Danny Garcia and Shawn Porter, everyone is going to talk about Errol Spence vs. Keith Thurman.
Keith Thurman No. 1, Errol Spence No. 2 and everything else is debatable.
You know how a fighter always comes into the dressing room way before a fight? That's me - I'm like a fighter.
He was a first-time nonviolent possible offender, ... And under the mandatory minimums, he was put in prison for 15 years. Not only does the punishment not fit the crime, but the mandatory minimums don't give judges any discretion to look at the background of the case, to read into the specifics of the case. I don't know a judge who really is in favor of the mandatory minimums.
I've been in the ring. I've fought in a title fight. I know what it is like to lose a fight. I know everything a fighter has been through.
I'm really terrible at math, so I won't even attempt to do ratios and percentages, but all I know is that there's a lot of new songs that no-one has heard yet, and that there's a lot of old songs that some very, very super hardcore fans have heard for sure - there are people that have been coming and seeing me play in bars in like 2002, and there are songs that those people heard.
I know people I feel are extremely talented, but I don’t know that I’ve ever heard any geniuses.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!