A Quote by Lech Walesa

I represent the concept that pluralism is essential, union pluralism. I made an oath about this. — © Lech Walesa
I represent the concept that pluralism is essential, union pluralism. I made an oath about this.
When I came here [to Malaysia] I heard that there is a problem with the concept of pluralism whereby pluralism is understood in a very narrow way, which I think is wrong. This is not to diminish your sense of truth in what you believe but to acknowledge the fact that we live in a world where we need to deal with pluralism. It's a fact.
The self identity of Man is transcultural, and thus cannot have any single point of reference. Pluralism is not synonymous with tolerance of a variety of opinions. Pluralism amounts to the recognition of the unthinkable, the absurd, and up to a limit, intolerable. Reality in itself does not need to be transparent intelligible.
Pluralism and tolerance are pillars of modern society. That has to be accepted. But pluralism doesn't just mean diversity. It means that we share the same rules and values, and are still nevertheless different. Islam doesn't have this idea. And Islam also has no tradition of tolerance.
Was the Soviet Union reformable? I would say no. They said, 'Okay, the Soviet Union isn't working.' They would say, 'No, it's great. We just need democracy, political pluralism, private property.' And then there was no Soviet Union. The European Union is the same.
The Founders believed that pluralism survived only within the concept of religious liberty espoused by American Christianity.
There should be pluralism - the concept of many religions, many truths. But we must also be careful not to become nihilistic.
Ironically, the first thing that appealed to me about Islam was its pluralism. The fact that the Koran praises all the great prophets of the past.
We have to nurture and support the idea of pluralism.
I am happy that Poland is returning to the road of pluralism and democracy.
In the culture of pluralism...the only thing that cannot be tolerated is a claim to exclusivity.
The introduction of political pluralism often quickly led to bad results.
You are also asked to take an oath, and that's the oath of service. The oath of service is not to secrecy, but to the Constitution - to protect it against all enemies, foreign and domestic. That's the oath that I kept, that James Clapper and former NSA director Keith Alexander did not. You raise your hand and you take the oath in your class when you are on board. All government officials are made to do it who work for the intelligence agencies - at least, that's where I took the oath.
We are part of an inspiringly colorful mosaic of cultures and traditions. I will nurture this pluralism.
I do think that the U.S. has an opportunity as a democracy to really exemplify what a religiously diverse society can be when it embraces the pluralism.
Pluralism is no longer simply an asset or a prerequisite for progress and development; it is vital to our existence.
One of the best ways of showing pluralism in action is for people to do service together, and that has so many benefits.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!